2013
DOI: 10.4172/2329-8847.1000102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Scale for the Evaluation of Proactive and Retroactive Interference in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Early Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract: Objective: The authors evaluated the psychometric properties and clinical utility of the Loewenstein-Acevedo Scale for Semantic Interference and Learning (LASSI-L), in patients with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (aMCI) and early Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: Subjects were administered Target List A and instructed to remember 15 common words belonging to a specific semantic category, using multi-modal, active encoding procedures. After free recall and cued recall trials of the target list, a second le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The outcome is also congruent with the inability of MCI individuals to benefit from category-specific semantic cues in memory tasks (e.g., Curiel et al, 2013) and the proactive interference in active learning of list of items (see Loewenstein and Acevedo, 2005;Crocco et al, 2014). This impairment would be characterized by a disruption of the automatic links between semantic representations due to neurodegerative thinning out in the relevant cortical areas (Binder et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The outcome is also congruent with the inability of MCI individuals to benefit from category-specific semantic cues in memory tasks (e.g., Curiel et al, 2013) and the proactive interference in active learning of list of items (see Loewenstein and Acevedo, 2005;Crocco et al, 2014). This impairment would be characterized by a disruption of the automatic links between semantic representations due to neurodegerative thinning out in the relevant cortical areas (Binder et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Thus, there are no reasons to predict a stronger cumulative semantic interference effect for the MCI group. Semantic processing (i.e., access to semantic information), however, is impaired in MCI (Curiel et al, 2013;Crocco et al, 2014;Joubert et al, 2010), and thus co-activation of representations of entities semantically similar to the target picture might be absent or limited. If so, MCI should (a) not show cumulative semantic interference effect and (b) show a regular repetition priming effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A unique feature of the LASSl-L is a second presentation of the second target list that taps failure to recover from proactive semantic interference (frPSl). The LASSl-L frPSl measure has been found to be: highly related to total and regional amyloid load in neuropsychologically normal community-dwelling elders (Loewenstein et al, 2016); has differentiated between aMCl patients with suspected AD from cognitively unimpaired elderly controls (CN) (Curiel et al, 2013; Crocco et al, 2014; Matías-Guiu et al, 2016); and has been associated with volumetric loss in AD prone areas among elders with amnestic MCl (Loewenstein et al, 2017b). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A unique aspect of the LASSI-L [unlike current measures of learning and memory], is that it provides a second opportunity to learn the competing List B targets, and performance deficits may reflect a failure to recover from the initial effects of PSI [frPSI]. We have previously shown that performance on the LASSI-L, particularly those vulnerable to frPSI, is highly discriminative between aMCI and cognitively normal groups [7, 9, 24] and is strongly related to loss of volume in several AD-prone brain regions among older adults with aMCI [9]. Gardini and colleagues [28] examined an MCI cohort with deficient performance on various semantic tasks, and found grey matter reductions in the parahippocampus, frontal and cingulate cortices and the amygdala compared to controls with no cognitive impairment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recovery from proactive semantic interference is a feature of the LASSI-L that is not assessed by any existing list-learning measure [4]. Test-retest reliabilities of the LASSI-L have been shown to be high in previous studies, and the accuracy of classification of aMCI patients versus cognitively normal elderly exceeded 90% [7, 24]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%