2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.02.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new set of 16S rRNA universal primers for identification of animal species

Abstract: In this study, bioinformatics were used to specifically design universal primers within 16S rRNA gene according to the following criteria: the priming sites needed to be sufficiently conserved to permit a reliable amplification (pooled samples) and the genetic marker needed to (a) be sufficiently variable to discriminate among most species and sufficiently conserved within than between species, (b) be short enough to allow also accurate amplification from processed samples (food) and non invasive approaches (f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained barcodes are then high-throughput sequenced and compared to a previously generated DNA sequence reference database from well-characterized species for taxonomic assignment (Taberlet et al, 2012a). In the case of animals, different barcodes such as portions of the small and large subunits of the nuclear ribosomal RNA (18S and 28S rRNA) genes (Machida and Knowlton, 2012) and of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI; Meusnier et al, 2008) and 16S rRNA genes (Sarri et al, 2014) have been proposed for metabarcoding. The COI gene is by far the most commonly used marker for metazoan metabarcoding (Ratnasingham and Hebert, 2013), for which thousands of reference sequences are available in public databases [the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD) contains >1,000,000 COI sequences belonging to animal species] and several amplification primers have been designed [more than 400 COI primers are published in the Consortium for the Barcode of Life (CBOL) primer database].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained barcodes are then high-throughput sequenced and compared to a previously generated DNA sequence reference database from well-characterized species for taxonomic assignment (Taberlet et al, 2012a). In the case of animals, different barcodes such as portions of the small and large subunits of the nuclear ribosomal RNA (18S and 28S rRNA) genes (Machida and Knowlton, 2012) and of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI; Meusnier et al, 2008) and 16S rRNA genes (Sarri et al, 2014) have been proposed for metabarcoding. The COI gene is by far the most commonly used marker for metazoan metabarcoding (Ratnasingham and Hebert, 2013), for which thousands of reference sequences are available in public databases [the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD) contains >1,000,000 COI sequences belonging to animal species] and several amplification primers have been designed [more than 400 COI primers are published in the Consortium for the Barcode of Life (CBOL) primer database].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bloodmeal analysis of field‐collected engorged females through PCR amplification of host DNA present in a bloodmeal is a valuable method to determine host use of many blood‐feeding arthropods, including biting midges (Slama et al, ), ticks (Allan et al, ), sandflies (Chaskopoulou et al, ), tsetse flies (Muturi et al, ), and mosquitoes (Burkett‐Cadena et al, ) amongst others. Bloodmeal analysis targets regions of certain genes that are well conserved throughout the animal kingdom but show sufficient interspecific variation for identification at the species level, including 16 s rRNA (Sarri et al, ), cytochrome b oxidase (Garros et al, ; Slama et al, ), and cytochrome c oxidase I (Ferri et al, ). As contact (biting) between vectors and susceptible hosts is a critical variable in determining vectorial capacity of a putative vector species, clearly delineating patterns of host use is important for inferring vector status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported that DNA as the most appropriate biomarker to identify the source of animal-derived materials and DNA-based techniques are reliable, robust, and rapid, especially species-specific PCR which has the potential to reach higher identification simplicity, sensitivity, and specificity. The target genes and DNA fragments used as markers for identifying animal species are mainly coming from the mitochondrial genome, such as cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) [8], the mitochondrial D-loop region [9], and cytochrome b [10], 16 s rRNA [11], and 12 s rRNA [12]. Many techniques based on the DNA fractions, such as species-specific PCR [12], direct PCR [13], real-time PCR [14], polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) [15], and sequencing [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%