2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2015.02.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new shape dependent drag correlation formula for non-spherical rough particles. Experiments and results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
116
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dioguardi and Mele (2015) and the new drag law here presented (equation (14)) have the best performance, also at very low Re, which proved to be problematic for the other laws but crucial for volcanological applications like ash dispersion modeling. Going deeper into detail, it can be seen that (14) further improved the performance at very low Re and in the range 10-100, which is the most problematic for Dioguardi and Mele (2015); this was not surprising, since this range includes the critical value Re = 50 at which there is the switch between the two parts of the law (see equation (19)). (2005), Ganser (1993), Bagheri and Bonadonna (2016), Dioguardi and Mele (2015), and (14).…”
Section: Dioguardi and Mele (2015)mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Dioguardi and Mele (2015) and the new drag law here presented (equation (14)) have the best performance, also at very low Re, which proved to be problematic for the other laws but crucial for volcanological applications like ash dispersion modeling. Going deeper into detail, it can be seen that (14) further improved the performance at very low Re and in the range 10-100, which is the most problematic for Dioguardi and Mele (2015); this was not surprising, since this range includes the critical value Re = 50 at which there is the switch between the two parts of the law (see equation (19)). (2005), Ganser (1993), Bagheri and Bonadonna (2016), Dioguardi and Mele (2015), and (14).…”
Section: Dioguardi and Mele (2015)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Bagheri and Bonadonna (2016) had the poorest performance after Dellino et al (2005), with a value of the slope of 1.261, meaning a general tendency to overestimate terminal velocities, which, in turn, is the result of the drag underestimation in the whole investigated Re range. Finally, Dioguardi and Mele (2015) and the new drag law ( (14) had the best performances, being a equal to 0.99 and 1, respectively. A closer inspection reveals that the new law better fit the points at terminal velocities between 0.01 and 0.1 m s À1 than Dioguardi and Mele (2015).…”
Section: 1002/2017jb014926mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations