2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new shoulder model with a biologically inspired glenohumeral joint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their developed model was not a general multibody model undergone large overall spatial displacement and rotation. Quental et al [285] also utilized a spherical clearance joint with clearance to propose a new shoulder model to perform inverse dynamic analysis to estimate the muscle and joint reaction forces of the upper limb and glenohumral articulation.…”
Section: Spherical Joint With Clearancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their developed model was not a general multibody model undergone large overall spatial displacement and rotation. Quental et al [285] also utilized a spherical clearance joint with clearance to propose a new shoulder model to perform inverse dynamic analysis to estimate the muscle and joint reaction forces of the upper limb and glenohumral articulation.…”
Section: Spherical Joint With Clearancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the methodology of the current study was considered adequate because the stability constraint applied during inverse dynamics is expected to simulate the stability requirements of the joint [ 49 ]. Furthermore, by modelling the shoulder joint as a spherical joint with clearance [ 50 ], the musculoskeletal model applied may be used in future studies to evaluate the role of the graft as a spacer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations of the model include an overly constrained glenohumeral joint, as the kinematics of a ball-socket joint does not allow translation of the humerus within the glenoid cavity [18,38]. Our inverse dynamics control algorithm does not include active stabilisation for constraining JRF within the glenoid cavity, leading potentially to an under-estimation of JRF [16] in the MRCT cases (-ssp-ssc and -ssp-isp-tmi), whereby the joint might be unstable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%