2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new similarity measure for collaborative filtering based recommender systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bag et al (2019) developed the relevant Jaccard similarity and Jaccard mean square distance similarity based on ratings data from the MovieLens dataset. Gazdar and Hidri (2020) proposed similarity using user ratings from MovieLens100K, MovieLens1M and Yahoo! Music data sets.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bag et al (2019) developed the relevant Jaccard similarity and Jaccard mean square distance similarity based on ratings data from the MovieLens dataset. Gazdar and Hidri (2020) proposed similarity using user ratings from MovieLens100K, MovieLens1M and Yahoo! Music data sets.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Similarity measures are considered also essential tools to solve problems in a broad range of AI domains and applications, specially when semantic matters. For example semantic web and linked data [29], recommender systems [11], Natural Language Processing [22], Information Retrieval, Knowledge Engineering [3],and many others. There are several similarity measures that have been used in CBR systems, and some comparison studies and frameworks exist [18,14].…”
Section: Related Work About Similaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous similarity measures have been proposed to better capture the relationship patterns between users and items. The Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), cosine similarity (COS), and the Jaccard index (JAC) are the most widely adopted similarity measures in the literature [12], [17], [26], [27], [28].…”
Section: B Similarity Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%