2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.05.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new simple method to measure wall thermal transmittance in situ and its adaptability analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawbacks -Non-invasive method [18]; -The higher the temperature gradient, the more reliable the results are [18]; -Internationally recognized and most widely used [19]; -Lightweight and easy to carry equipment [20]; -Can be used in controlled laboratory conditions or in in-situ measurements [17].…”
Section: Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Drawbacks -Non-invasive method [18]; -The higher the temperature gradient, the more reliable the results are [18]; -Internationally recognized and most widely used [19]; -Lightweight and easy to carry equipment [20]; -Can be used in controlled laboratory conditions or in in-situ measurements [17].…”
Section: Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works have reported that the accuracy, error and uncertainty of the results achieved using the HFM method can be affected by practical issues (for example the measurement locations), and by temperature fluctuations and small temperature difference between the interior and exterior environments [20][112] [120][121] [122]; so the tests must be performed during the heating period (winter), to ensure the largest temperature difference. To overcome outdoor and indoor thermal environment limitation of the HFM method and to avoid the heavy equipment of the HB, Meng et al [19] proposed a new simple HB -HFM method for in-situ measurements ( Figure 7).…”
Section: In-situ Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2015, in their turn, authors had verified the feasibility of a new developed simple hot box-HFM method (SHB-HFM) to address an in situ measurement of wall thermal transmittance [68]. This SHB-HFM was preceded by another experiment developed by Chinese researchers in 2012, designated Temperature Control Box-HFM method (TCB-HFM) [69] cited in [70]. However, the authors of [70] (p. 748) described this TCB-HFM as not suitable for the in situ measurement, also noticing that measurement thermal transmittance results obtained in [69] were "55% higher than the design thermal transmittance and that the measurement error was attributed to high moisture", denoting the problem of not controlling for humidity in the test.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the final aim of monitoring hygrothermal parameters instead of exclusively the thermal transmittance, the most significant difference between the boxes presented in [68] or [70] In situ monitoring can be very significant in the case of historic buildings, since: (i) walls samples cannot be examined in the lab (for cultural heritage protection issues, no samples can be removed from original sites); (ii) many historic buildings are abandoned or not in use, and, therefore, are not heated; (iii) many of these building present particular features as high ceilings/volumes and therefore the traditional 1 m × 1 m lab measured surface might not be representative enough of the vertical heat stratification of a historic wall.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%