2007
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd:20060534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new single-pole switching technique for suppressing turbine-generator torsional vibrations and enhancing power stability and continuity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the step-1, the step-2 focuses on the impact when a reclosing operation occurs. It has been researched that the impact on the turbine generator can be evaluated by a sudden power change, ΔP, generated by a switching operation [19][20][21][22][23]. An IEEE Committee recommends that a ΔP value equal to 0.5 per unit be considered an acceptable screening level for evaluating steady-state switching if a turbine generator is operating under the allowable load condition [14][15].…”
Section: Step-2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the step-1, the step-2 focuses on the impact when a reclosing operation occurs. It has been researched that the impact on the turbine generator can be evaluated by a sudden power change, ΔP, generated by a switching operation [19][20][21][22][23]. An IEEE Committee recommends that a ΔP value equal to 0.5 per unit be considered an acceptable screening level for evaluating steady-state switching if a turbine generator is operating under the allowable load condition [14][15].…”
Section: Step-2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of single-pole switching technique on respective line has been well known in numerous research works [1][2], resulting from the frequent single-line to ground fault. A great benefit on enhancing transient stability is gained due to less real power fluctuation through only one pole switching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the persistently negative-sequence currents would inject to nearby turbine generators during the dead time between single-pole clearing and line reclosing. One increasing concern is the induced electromagnetic disturbing torque (E/M torque) with double system frequency (120Hz) component, which could excite SPSR effect and damaging torques on LP final row (L0) or next-to-final (L1) row turbinegenerator blades [2,4]. To solve such a problem is the motivation behind the development of our proposed method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations