2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new single-tube platform of melting temperature curve analysis based on multiplex real-time PCR using EvaGreen for simultaneous screening detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in food

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most multiplex qPCR developed for the identification of different foodborne pathogens use hydrolysis probes [ 38 , 39 ] or high resolution melting analysis [ 15 ], which need appropriate reagents and a more complex downstream analysis, increasing the price in the first case or the time of the analysis in the second. On other hand, studies for multiplex real-time PCR without these approach, using only intercalating dyes have reported only the amplification of one or two target when an internal control is used [ 40 , 41 ], or when more pathogens are reported no internal control is employed [ 42 , 43 ]. The implementation of an internal control have been highly recommended by different authors, and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) established this component as requirement for routine qPCR testing in food samples [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most multiplex qPCR developed for the identification of different foodborne pathogens use hydrolysis probes [ 38 , 39 ] or high resolution melting analysis [ 15 ], which need appropriate reagents and a more complex downstream analysis, increasing the price in the first case or the time of the analysis in the second. On other hand, studies for multiplex real-time PCR without these approach, using only intercalating dyes have reported only the amplification of one or two target when an internal control is used [ 40 , 41 ], or when more pathogens are reported no internal control is employed [ 42 , 43 ]. The implementation of an internal control have been highly recommended by different authors, and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) established this component as requirement for routine qPCR testing in food samples [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of the platform developed in this study was compared to that of the colloidal gold-labeled lateral flow assay, traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, gold magnetic bifunctional nanobeads-labeled immunochromatographic test strip, multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), propidium monoazide–multiplex PCR, and multiplex magnetic capture hybridization with multiplex real-time PCR, as shown in Table . In all of the assays, immunological methods, such as traditional ELISA and lateral flow assay, were simple to operate and tolerant to the sample matrix.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan (BPOM) report (2019), approximately 61% of the microbes detected in several food products were pathogenic. Two bacterial species, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus have been confirmed as the dominant pathogenic microorganisms in food products (Bundidamorn et al, 2018;Incili et al, 2019;Qi et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2021b). These infections cause several poisoning symptoms, such as diarrhea, fever, nausea, vomiting and occasionally even death.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%