A new skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewed from the literature

Abstract

There is an increasing awareness of the risks and dangers of exposure to radiation associated with repeated radiographic assessment of spinal curvature and spinal movements. As such, attempts are continuously being made to develop skinsurface devices for use in examining the progression and response to treatment of various spinal disorders. However, the reliability and validity of measurements recorded with such devices must be established before they can be recommended for use in the research or clinical environment. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability of measurements using a newly developed skin-surface device, the Spinal Mouse. Twenty healthy volunteers (mean age 41±12 years, nine males, 11 females) took part. On 2 separate days, spinal curvature was measured with the Spinal Mouse during standing, full flexion, and full extension (each three times by each of two examiners). Paired t-tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and standard errors of measurement (SEM) with 95% confidence intervals were used to characterise between-day and interexaminer reliability for: standing sacral angle, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, and ranges of motion (flexion, extension) of the thoracic spine, lumbar spine, hips, and trunk. The between-day reliability for segmental ranges of flexion was also determined for each motion segment from T1-2 to L5-S1. The majority of parameters measured for the 'global regions' (thoracic, lumbar, or hips) showed good between-day reliability. Depending on the parameter of interest, between-day ICCs ranged from 0.67 to 0.92 for examiner 1 (average 0.82) and 0.57 to 0.95 for examiner 2 (average 0.83); for 70% of the parameters measured, the ICCs were greater than 0.8 and generally highest for the lumbar spine and whole trunk measures. For lumbar spine range of flexion, the SEM was approximately 3°. The ICCs were also good for the interexaminer comparisons, ranging from 0.62 to 0.93 on day 1 (average 0.81) and 0.70 to 0.94 on day 2 (average 0.86), although small systematic differences were sometimes observed in their mean values. The latter were still evident even if both examiners used the same skin markings. For segmental ranges of flexion, the ICCs varied between vertebral levels but overall were lower than for the global measures (average for all levels in all analyses, ICC 0.6). For each examiner, the average between-day SEM over all vertebral levels was approximately 2°. For 'global' regions of the spine, the Spinal Mouse delivered consistently reliable values for standing curvatures and ranges of motion which compared well with those reported in the literature. This suggests that the device can be reliably implemented for in vivo studies of the ORIGINAL ARTICLE Eur Spine J (2004) 13 : 122-136 DOI 10.1007 Anne F. Mannion Katrin Knecht Gordana Balaban Jiri Dvorak Dieter Grob A new skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewed from the ...

A prospective study of the interrelationship between subjective and objective measures of disability before and 2 months after lumbar decompression surgery for disc herniation

“…Thus, the patients had flatter and stiffer lumbar spines than normal. The controls showed mean values for ROF lumbar similar to those reported in the literature for healthy individuals assessed using other skin-mounted motion analysis devices [8, 12,34], double inclinometers [36] or X-ray measurements [44], in part confirming the validity of the measures. Whether the reduced ROF lumbar can be attributed entirely to the results of the disc prolapse, or, rather, was also a factor contributing to its development in the first place, cannot be ascertained from the results of this study.…”

“…1). The intratester and inter-tester, and day-to-day reliability of the Spinal Mouse has been published in previous studies [25,34], in which further details about the system are also given [34]. Briefly, the device is guided along the spine, slightly paravertebrally, from a start position at the spinous process of C7 to an end position at S3.…”

“…The patient was instructed to move at a speed of his/her choosing and to hold the end position for about 3 s, whilst the measurement was made. The best two trials (judged in relation to the total trunk flexion attained)-in the majority of cases, the last two of the three-were averaged for use in further analyses (as described in [34]). The patients were instructed to move as far as they possibly could without causing intolerable pain.…”

“…The sample size calculations for both the prospective study (changes after surgery) and the comparison of the DH patients with normal controls were based on the results of our previous reliability study [29,34]. We calculated that, with at least 30 patients in each group, the probability would be 95% that the study would detect a significant difference between the two groups of interest at a two-sided 5.0% significance level, if the true difference between them for the range of flexion of the lumbar spine was at least 9°.…”

Preliminary study: reliability of the spinal wheel. A novel device to measure spinal postures applied to sitting and standing

“…To the authors' knowledge, the reliability of this device has not been demonstrated. The Spinal Mouse (Idiag, Voletswil, Switzerland) is a device that contains accelerometers, which measure distance and inclination as it is guided along the length of the spine [33]. A study which evaluated the reliability of the Spinal Mouse demonstrated moderate to good between-day and interexaminer reliability when measuring lumbar and thoracic curvatures [33].…”