2022
DOI: 10.1080/14772019.2022.2137441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new small-bodied ankylosaurian dinosaur from the Upper Cretaceous of North Patagonia (Río Negro Province, Argentina)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mammals of North American origin were already diverse in the earliest Paleocene of South America, suggesting they must have crossed over earlier (67, 68). However, actual fossil evidence of exchanges during the latest Cretaceous is only provided by dinosaurs: the Austrokritosauria and the patagonian nodosaurid Patagopelta had North American ancestors (4, 69), while large titanosaurs in North America likely had ancestors in South America (70, 71).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mammals of North American origin were already diverse in the earliest Paleocene of South America, suggesting they must have crossed over earlier (67, 68). However, actual fossil evidence of exchanges during the latest Cretaceous is only provided by dinosaurs: the Austrokritosauria and the patagonian nodosaurid Patagopelta had North American ancestors (4, 69), while large titanosaurs in North America likely had ancestors in South America (70, 71).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mammals of North American origin had already become diverse in South America in the early Paleocene, suggesting that they must have crossed over earlier: However, no remains have yet been found in the Cretaceous of South America ( 53 , 54 ). Currently, the most reliable fossil evidence of exchanges during the Cretaceous is provided by the Austrokritosauria, with other evidence also provided by Patagopelta , a possible nodosaurid from Patagonia ( 4 , 55 ), and the large North American titanosaur Alamosaurus , with potential ancestry in South America ( 56 , 57 ). Therefore, if the ancestors of Gonkoken were from North America, they could have followed a similar route.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ankylosaurian phylogeny remains unstable. Numerical cladistic analyses over the last three decades have generated various hypotheses of interrelationships (Kirkland 1998 2005; Thompson et al 2012;Han et al 2014;Wiersma and Irmis 2018;Norman 2021;Soto-Acuña et al 2021;Yao et al 2022;Riguetti et al 2022bRiguetti et al , 2022aRaven et al 2023), but in recent times these datasets converged onto the three independent lines of research rooted in Arbour and Currie (2016), Wiersma and Irmis (2018) and Raven et al (2023). The common feature between them is that the ankylosaurian relationships are so unstable that, in these maximum parsimony analyses, consensus is typically obtained by majority rule.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%