2017
DOI: 10.3390/mca22020031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Smoothing Nonlinear Penalty Function for Constrained Optimization

Abstract: Abstract:In this study, a new smoothing nonlinear penalty function for constrained optimization problems is presented. It is proved that the optimal solution of the smoothed penalty problem is an approximate optimal solution of the original problem. Based on the smoothed penalty function, we develop an algorithm for finding an optimal solution of the optimization problems with inequality constraints. We further discuss the convergence of this algorithm and test this algorithm with three numerical examples. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical results obtained by both of our algorithms are much better than the results in [14] and find the correct solutions as in [15]. Further, it can be seen that the approximate solutions obtained by our algorithms with the lower iteration numbers in comparison with the [14].…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerical results obtained by both of our algorithms are much better than the results in [14] and find the correct solutions as in [15]. Further, it can be seen that the approximate solutions obtained by our algorithms with the lower iteration numbers in comparison with the [14].…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In [14], the obtained global solution is x * = (2.3295, 3.1784) with objective function value f (x * ) = −5.5080. In the paper [15], the obtained approximate optimal solution is x * = (2.112103, 3.900086) with objective function value f (x * ) = −6.012190.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [21], the obtained global solution is x * = (2.3295, 3.1784) with objective function value f(x * ) = −5.5080. In the paper [22], the obtained approximate optimal solution is x * = (2.112103, 3.900086) with objective function value f(x * ) = −6.012190. Numerical results obtained by our algorithm are much better than the results in [21] and find the correct solutions as in [22].…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of βmax is 1.0e 5 . The quadratic equation involves large matrix inversion [18] and can be computed using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) [19] for fast computation.…”
Section: Proposed Gradient Minimization Based Approach For Image Smoomentioning
confidence: 99%