2016
DOI: 10.1186/s10152-016-0476-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new species of Cephalorhyncha Adrianov, 1999 (Kinorhyncha: Cyclorhagida) from the Aegean Coast of Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the smaller echinoderid genera this resulted in positive confirmation of the presence of female papillae in following species: Polacanthoderes martinezi Sørensen, 2008, segments 6 to 7, and in Cephalorhyncha polunga Sánchez et al, 2019, segment 7. Absence of female papillae could be positively confirmed for Cephalorhyncha teresae all species of Meristoderes Herranz et al, 2012. Presence of female papillae is likewise uncertain for the two small and laterally compressed species Cephalorhyncha liticola and C. flosculosa Yildiz et al, 2016. For the species-rich genus Echinoderes the presence of female papillae are confirmed for all species included in the presence study (Table 20). From more recent studies we also have positive confirmation of female papillae from all species of the Echinoderes spinifurca group (see Landers & Sørensen 2018;Sørensen et al 2018;Varney et al 2019), from E. multiporus Yamasaki et al, 2018 (segment 8) and in E. schwieringae Yamasaki et al, 2019 (segments 7-8) (see Yamasaki et al, 2018a.…”
Section: Female Papillaementioning
confidence: 92%
“…For the smaller echinoderid genera this resulted in positive confirmation of the presence of female papillae in following species: Polacanthoderes martinezi Sørensen, 2008, segments 6 to 7, and in Cephalorhyncha polunga Sánchez et al, 2019, segment 7. Absence of female papillae could be positively confirmed for Cephalorhyncha teresae all species of Meristoderes Herranz et al, 2012. Presence of female papillae is likewise uncertain for the two small and laterally compressed species Cephalorhyncha liticola and C. flosculosa Yildiz et al, 2016. For the species-rich genus Echinoderes the presence of female papillae are confirmed for all species included in the presence study (Table 20). From more recent studies we also have positive confirmation of female papillae from all species of the Echinoderes spinifurca group (see Landers & Sørensen 2018;Sørensen et al 2018;Varney et al 2019), from E. multiporus Yamasaki et al, 2018 (segment 8) and in E. schwieringae Yamasaki et al, 2019 (segments 7-8) (see Yamasaki et al, 2018a.…”
Section: Female Papillaementioning
confidence: 92%
“…The current phylogenetic positions of wormlike kinorhynchs, nested in distantly related clades of the tree (see Sørensen et al 2015), suggest that their characteristic vermiform appearance evolved convergently, most likely driven by an ecological shift in niches from muddy sediments to sandy interstitial environments. However, it is important to stress that not all interstitial kinorhynchs show elongated trunks and thin cuticle, which is the case for several species of interstitial Echinoderes and Cephalorhyncha (see Higgins 1986;Sørensen 2008;Sánchez et al 2012;Yildiz et al 2016).…”
Section: Are Aberrant Kinorhynchs Adapted To the Interstitial Environment?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One might speculate if the cuticular ornamentation in C. styx is a habitat adaptation, rather than a trait of phylogenetic significance, but it also differs considerably from other beach-and sand dwelling kinorhynch species. Beach inhabiting kinorhynchs include Cephalorhyncha flosculosa Yildiz et al, 2016, Cephalorhyncha liticola Sørensen, 2008, C. nybakkeni (Higgins, 1986, but these species show a rather typical echinoderid cuticle ornamentation with bracteate cuticular hairs (Higgins 1986;Sørensen 2008;Yildiz et al 2016). Neuhaus & Kegel (2015) Our observations confirm to a great extent the LM observations on C. styx provided by Neuhaus & Kegel (2015).…”
Section: Cuticular Trunk Ornamentationmentioning
confidence: 99%