2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcz.2019.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new species of Echinoderes (Cyclorhagida: Echinoderidae) from the San Juan Islands, Washington State, USA, and insights into the kinorhynch transcriptome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Absence of female papillae could be positively confirmed for Cephalorhyncha teresae all species of Meristoderes Herranz et al, 2012. Presence of female papillae is likewise uncertain for the two small and laterally compressed species Cephalorhyncha liticola and C. flosculosa Yildiz et al, 2016. For the species-rich genus Echinoderes the presence of female papillae are confirmed for all species included in the presence study (Table 20). From more recent studies we also have positive confirmation of female papillae from all species of the Echinoderes spinifurca group (see Landers & Sørensen 2018;Sørensen et al 2018;Varney et al 2019), from E. multiporus Yamasaki et al, 2018 (segment 8) and in E. schwieringae Yamasaki et al, 2019 (segments 7-8) (see Yamasaki et al, 2018a. In addition to these, the interactive key of Yamasaki et al (2020a) confirms the presence of female papillae in E. krishnaswarmyi (segments 7-8), E. neospinosus G a Ordóñez et al, 2008 (segments 7-8), and E. truncatus Higgins, 1983 (segments 6-8).…”
Section: Female Papillaesupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Absence of female papillae could be positively confirmed for Cephalorhyncha teresae all species of Meristoderes Herranz et al, 2012. Presence of female papillae is likewise uncertain for the two small and laterally compressed species Cephalorhyncha liticola and C. flosculosa Yildiz et al, 2016. For the species-rich genus Echinoderes the presence of female papillae are confirmed for all species included in the presence study (Table 20). From more recent studies we also have positive confirmation of female papillae from all species of the Echinoderes spinifurca group (see Landers & Sørensen 2018;Sørensen et al 2018;Varney et al 2019), from E. multiporus Yamasaki et al, 2018 (segment 8) and in E. schwieringae Yamasaki et al, 2019 (segments 7-8) (see Yamasaki et al, 2018a. In addition to these, the interactive key of Yamasaki et al (2020a) confirms the presence of female papillae in E. krishnaswarmyi (segments 7-8), E. neospinosus G a Ordóñez et al, 2008 (segments 7-8), and E. truncatus Higgins, 1983 (segments 6-8).…”
Section: Female Papillaesupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Echinoderes pilosus only shares spine/tube and glandular cell outlet type 2 pattern with four additional species, i.e., Echinoderes kohni Varney et al, 2019, E. lupherorum Sørensen et al, 2018, E. microaperturus Sørensen et al, 2012and E. yamasakii Sørensen et al, 2018(see Sørensen et al 2012Varney et al 2019). However, these four species all belong to the Echinoderes spinifurca species group, which are characterized by species with conspicuous acicular tergal extensions (see Landers & Sørensen 2018;Sørensen et al 2018).…”
Section: Differential Notes On E Pilosusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of these similarities suggests that they might be closely related to each other, representing the Echinoderes multiporus species group, as with the Echinoderes coulli species group and the Echinoderes spinifurca species group (see e.g. Sørensen et al ., 2018; Randsø et al ., 2019; Varney et al ., 2019). The presence/absence of female-specific ventrolateral/ventromedial papillae in E. kajiharai sp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the rearrangement of the classification system based on the recent molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses, 11 families are recognized in the phylum (Sørensen et al ., 2015). Among the families, Echinoderidae represents the most speciose family, comprised of five genera and about 150 species (Sørensen et al ., 2015; Sánchez et al ., 2019; Varney et al ., 2019; Yamasaki et al ., 2019; Cepeda et al ., 2019 a , 2019 b , 2019 c ). Kinorhynch families, genera and some species-groups comprised of closely related species are distributed worldwide (Neuhaus, 2013; Randsø et al ., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some species of Echinoderes are also characterized by very long dagger-like tergal extensions. For instance, E. sylviae Landers & Sørensen, 2018 from the Gulf of Mexico, West Atlantic, and E. lupherorumSørensen et al, 2018 and E. kohni Varney, Funch, Kocot & from the North-East Pacific have tergal extensions about 7 and 8% of TL, respectively (seeSørensen et al 2018;Varney et al 2019). In E. higginsiHuys & Coomans, 1989 from the North Sea and E. spinifurcaSørensen et al, 2005 from the Gulf of Mexico these extensions constitute about 11% of TL (seeHuys & Coomans 1989;Sørensen et al 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%