1991
DOI: 10.1080/00222939100770431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new species ofStomaphisWalker (Homoptera: Aphididae) from Czechoslovakia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4a,b) and second segment of hind tarsus (Fig. 4c,d) to middle tarsus) (Czylok & Blackman 1991) allow the distinction of this species from both the viviparous and oviparous female of S. bratislavensis. These two species differ also in other morphological characters.…”
Section: Taxonomic Comments On the Morphological And Molecular Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4a,b) and second segment of hind tarsus (Fig. 4c,d) to middle tarsus) (Czylok & Blackman 1991) allow the distinction of this species from both the viviparous and oviparous female of S. bratislavensis. These two species differ also in other morphological characters.…”
Section: Taxonomic Comments On the Morphological And Molecular Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no other record of its presence in Europe. The species described by Czylok and Blackman (1991) feeds on trunks of Quercus petrea Liebl., and in its appearance in life strongly resembles S. radicicola. The latter was described in 1947 by Hille Ris Lambers based on specimens collected in Leersum, Netherlands (Hille Ris Lambers 1947) (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With their effective but relatively slow dispersal and high host specificity, the molecular diversity of Stomaphis populations may reveal new pattems of insect phylogeography and postglacial migration routes. Some species are very rare and known only from disparate localities, such as S. bratislavensis (Czylok & Blackman, 1991) or 5. acquerinoi. Other species such as S. wojciechowskii Depa, despite being relatively abundant, have remained unrecognized for a long time .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mentioned transverse reinforcements form four open cells, and in three of them, two kinds of sunken coeloconic sensilla are visible, with two more protruding (type II) sensilla and one more sunken (type I) sensillum, which is poorly visible (Figure 14L). Type II coeloconic sensilla are characterized by many (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) long, finger-like projections (Figure 14M), whereas type I coeloconic sensilla (the more sunken type) have only 6-8 shorter projections and lie deep in an additional, small circular cavity (Figure 14N). The separate small multiporous placoid sensillum, which lies on the basal part of the terminal process, is like the first one, i.e., mushroom-shaped and rounded, about 10-11 µm in diameter, surrounded by a small, protuberant, and inrolled flange with smooth edges (Figure 14O).…”
Section: Antennal Sensillamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tuberolachnini was established by Oestlund [10] but without the broad acceptance of aphidologists. Several authors who presented different Lachninae classification proposals never used Tuberolachnini as an independent group [11][12][13][14][15][16]. Only Mamontova [17][18][19][20] treated Tuberolachnini as one of the tribes within Lachninae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%