1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.1999.tb00042.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new species of muntjac, Muntiacus putaoensis (Artiodactyla: Cervidae) from northern Myanmar

Abstract: A new species of barking deer (Muntiacus spp.) is described from northern Myanmar. Diagnostic DNA character data are presented along with preliminary information on morphology, distribution, and phylogenetic relationships. This discovery contributes significantly to our knowledge of this poorly studied group and highlights the importance of continued field surveys in remote regions. Similar studies have resulted in a significant increase in conservation efforts in other parts of South-east Asia, and argue for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Systematists favor treating nucleotides as any other character [33], [34]. While a character-based paradigm has been in operation since the beginning of DNA-based identification [23], [35], barcoding as commonly practiced ( sensu Hebert et al [36]) remains distance-based. In a sense this is phenetics [37] reincarnate, though barcoding is not atheoretical [38] but rather designates identifications based either on similarity thresholds [39] or on phenetic clustering [36] using neighbor-joining methods [40] under the premise that there will be well-defined gaps between intraspecific and interspecific distances [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematists favor treating nucleotides as any other character [33], [34]. While a character-based paradigm has been in operation since the beginning of DNA-based identification [23], [35], barcoding as commonly practiced ( sensu Hebert et al [36]) remains distance-based. In a sense this is phenetics [37] reincarnate, though barcoding is not atheoretical [38] but rather designates identifications based either on similarity thresholds [39] or on phenetic clustering [36] using neighbor-joining methods [40] under the premise that there will be well-defined gaps between intraspecific and interspecific distances [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5,6) A character-based approach can be easily applied to DNA barcoding. (3,(7)(8)(9) Taxonomy is species discovery, DNA barcoding is species identification and DNA taxonomy is something completely different The second major problem that needs further appraisal and clarification in the context of Waugh's (1) review, is the issue of how DNA barcodes can be used in modern biological endeavors such as community ecology, biodiversity studies, evolutionary biology, conservation biology and behavioral ecology. Several examples are listed by the author, but there is a general blurring of two major and very different objectives that have been attributed to DNA barcoding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, and most pragmatically, COI sequences could usefully augment morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses already underway on LCR fishes. Secondly, the use of COI sequence diagnostics in concert with morphological characters in species descriptions (Amato et al 1999;Victor 2007) is recognized as an increasingly useful synergy. Incorporating gene sequences from type specimens (or retrospectively from topotypical material) optimizes the accuracy of future barcode identifications-which is particularly important when faunas are poorly understood taxonomically and geographical distributions undefined-while allowing for these data to be used as any other discrete character (DeSalle 2006) for unambiguously diagnosing species (DeSalle et al 2005;Lowenstein et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%