“…By having two macroplacoids, no microplacoid and septulum, and presence of cuticular sculpture, Hypsibius nivalis sp. nov. is the most similar to Hypsibius biscuitiformis Bartoš, 1960 42 , Hypsibius calcaratus Bartoš, 1935 43 , Hypsibius camelopardalis Ramazzotti & Maucci, 1983 44 , Hypsibius giusepperamazzotti Sudzuki, 1975 45 , Hypsibius macrocalcaratus Beasley, 1988 46 , Hypsibius maculatus Iharos, 1969 47 , Hypsibius morikawai Ito, 1995 48 , Hypsibius ragonesei Binda & Pilato, 1985 49 , Hypsibius roanensis Nelson & McGlothlin, 1993 50 , Hypsibius runae Bartoš, 1941 51 and Hypsibius stiliferus Abe, 2004 52 but differs from: - H. biscuitiformis described from mosses in Hungary by: type of cuticular sculpture (polygonal granules, each polygon is separated, polygons form reticular network in H. nivalis sp. nov. vs. fine and regular granulation in H. biscuitiformis ), presence of cuticular bars, and different shape of second macroplacoid (rod shaped in H. nivalis sp.
…”