1976
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3886(76)90002-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new system for measuring the charging tendency of solid particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristics of the triboelectric charging can be evaluated by various methods; however, the particles may not be sufficiently charged. Kittaka and Murata (1976), Rowley (2001), and Matsusaka et al (2008b) proposed a method using a cylinder in which particles can be charged by a circular airflow (Fig. 53).…”
Section: General Techniques For Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of the triboelectric charging can be evaluated by various methods; however, the particles may not be sufficiently charged. Kittaka and Murata (1976), Rowley (2001), and Matsusaka et al (2008b) proposed a method using a cylinder in which particles can be charged by a circular airflow (Fig. 53).…”
Section: General Techniques For Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The whole line was then relocated to the bottom of the chamber. Next, it was replaced with 3/8 inch copper tubing and valve 28 Arlehlr L.n.i and relocated to above the rotating cylinder. The 1 inch pipe was replaced with the 3/8 inch tubing to increase the gas velocity through this line.…”
Section: Arl_hirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in the adhesive tendency probably is caused by changes in the electrical force component due to triboelectrical charging. Different drug materials will possess different tendencies to be triboelectrically charged with the result that rates of adhesion saturation with blending time will differ (Kittaka & Murata 1976). Verification of electro-static charge accumulation in the system is not possible in freshly prepared mixtures because of the limitations of the air stream Faraday cage for determining the charge measurement at the interactive unit interface due t o incomplete drug particle removal from the carrier and interaction with the cage (Kulvanich & Stewart 1 9 8 7~) .…”
Section: * Correspondencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During powder processing, the number of contacts and collisions can be increased by increasing the speed of particle motion (i.e. the degree of agitation in the mixer) and the time of processing (Peterson 1954;Kittaka & Murata 1976;Kittaka et all979;Lee & Weser 1979;Staniforth & Rees 1982). For example, during the preparation of an interactive mixture, the exchange of adherent drug particles between the carriers occurs as the particles are displaced from one carrier and randomly readhere to another (Travers & White 1971: Travers 1975Barbosa Canovas & Peleg 1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%