2019
DOI: 10.2118/191407-pa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Technique for Quantifying Pressure Interference in Fractured Horizontal Shale Wells

Abstract: Summary Pressure communication is commonly observed in fractured horizontal shale wells, particularly at early times when wells are placed on production. In this paper we present a new technique, based on the diffusion exponent from the power-law model, to quantify connectivity in multistage-hydraulic-fractured wells with complex fracture networks. In addition to explaining the theory and analysis techniques, we present examples using measured bottomhole pressure (BHP) from the Permian Basin Wol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 13 shows real-field data digitized from Chu et al (2020) observed in Well 4H from testing Well 3H. The same information was reported in a dimensionless form by Han et al (2019).…”
Section: Comments On the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 13 shows real-field data digitized from Chu et al (2020) observed in Well 4H from testing Well 3H. The same information was reported in a dimensionless form by Han et al (2019).…”
Section: Comments On the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Luo et al (2021) developed a numerical model that predicts the productivity of shale gas horizontal wells, in which, fractures present an interference between them and could register and analyze the azimuth and fracture conductivity. Chu et al (2020) conducted a study on the pressure interference between wells connected by a fracture using an analytical model proposed by Chen and Raghavan (2015). Chu et al (2020) found that the Chow pressure group (CPG) is a quantitative indicator of connectivity when anomalous diffusion is observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Often, it is difficult to obtain stable CPG values in real field data, which can lead to error in the estimate of MPI. Chu et al (2020) propose that CPG less than 0.5 corresponds to weak interference, 0.5-0.75 as moderate interference, and CPG greater than 0.75 corresponds to strong interference. Detailed explanation of the CPG methodology is provided by (Ballinger et al, 2022).…”
Section: Review Of the Existing Cpg Based Methodology To Quantify Int...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scheme, rather than following the classical time-distance relationship, r 2~t , with r being the distance and t being time; the transient follows the relation r 2~ta where a is a constant with a < 1 (subdiffusion) or with a > 1 (superdiffusion), or even with a = 1 (combined influences). Chu et al (2019Chu et al ( , 2020 discuss the advantages of addressing atypical behaviors employing a subdiffusive model to evaluate wells of the Permian basin produced through multiple hydraulic fractures (for both single and multiple well-tests). Quantitative estimates of the exponent a for the tests discussed in Chu et al (2019) are given in Raghavan and Chen (2018b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%