2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10665-016-9854-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new technique for solving pressure–rate deconvolution problem in pressure transient testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Water 2018, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 14 [19][20][21]. Using pressure derivative data in deconvolution leads to a nonlinear least-squares objective function that is different from those used in the earlier deconvolution methods and eliminates the dependency of the deconvolved responses on the initial reservoir pressure.…”
Section: The Division Of Production Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Water 2018, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 14 [19][20][21]. Using pressure derivative data in deconvolution leads to a nonlinear least-squares objective function that is different from those used in the earlier deconvolution methods and eliminates the dependency of the deconvolved responses on the initial reservoir pressure.…”
Section: The Division Of Production Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small error in the initial reservoir pressure could make a significant difference in the late time periods of the deconvolved responses that can lead to an incorrect interpretation model, particularly misinterpretation of the boundaries. The method presented above is based on pressure derivative data rather than pressure data that are used in all published deconvolution algorithms [19][20][21]. Using pressure derivative data in deconvolution leads to a nonlinear least-squares objective function that is different from those used in the earlier deconvolution methods and eliminates the dependency of the deconvolved responses on the initial reservoir pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%