2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new temperature dependent fracture strength model for the ZrB2–SiC composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The material properties of the C/SiC composite are given by: V f = 0.3, r f = 3.5 µm, ξ d = 0.1 J/m 2 , η f = 0.002, η m = 0.001, and T 0 = 1000 • C, and the temperature-dependent constituent properties are given by [24][25][26][27][28]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material properties of the C/SiC composite are given by: V f = 0.3, r f = 3.5 µm, ξ d = 0.1 J/m 2 , η f = 0.002, η m = 0.001, and T 0 = 1000 • C, and the temperature-dependent constituent properties are given by [24][25][26][27][28]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, when the ambient temperature changes, it will affect the properties of the material, and we need to extend the relevant parameters to temperature dependence; in addition, the RTS can be released to some extent due to the inevitable inherent defects of the material and the inadequate fiber/matrix interface 10,24 . The true value of RTS is not as large as it calculated by Equation ().…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature-dependent fiber/matrix interface debonded energy of γ d (T ) and the matrix fracture energy of γ m (T ) can be described using the following equations. [31] (17) (18) where T o denotes the reference temperature; T m denotes the fabricated temperature; γ do and γ mo denote the interface debonded energy and matrix fracture energy at the reference temperature of T o ; and C P (T) can be described using the following equation. The effects of fiber volume fraction, interface shear stress, interface frictional coefficient, interface debonded energy and matrix fracture energy on the temperaturedependent proportional limit stress and interface debonded length are discussed.…”
Section: Theoreticalmentioning
confidence: 99%