2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new terrain matching method for estimating laser pointing and ranging systematic biases for spaceborne photon-counting laser altimeters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After adjustment, the STD of the crossover differences decreases from 0.81 m to 0.80 m. The improvement of only 0.01 m indicates that the bias of ICESat-2 terrain data between different beams was very small. As shown in Figure 10, the STD of the estimated systematic bias for all beams was 0.09 m and the MAE was 0.07 m. This is nearly consistent with the conclusion of a previous study [22], which showed that the ICESat-2 data product had a ranging bias of 0.13 m. The maximum and minimum systematic bias estimates were 0.29 and −0.27 m, respectively. Table 5 details the results before and after adjustment for the beams marked by the red star in Figure 10.…”
Section: Validation and Analysis Of Icesat-2 Measured Datasupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…After adjustment, the STD of the crossover differences decreases from 0.81 m to 0.80 m. The improvement of only 0.01 m indicates that the bias of ICESat-2 terrain data between different beams was very small. As shown in Figure 10, the STD of the estimated systematic bias for all beams was 0.09 m and the MAE was 0.07 m. This is nearly consistent with the conclusion of a previous study [22], which showed that the ICESat-2 data product had a ranging bias of 0.13 m. The maximum and minimum systematic bias estimates were 0.29 and −0.27 m, respectively. Table 5 details the results before and after adjustment for the beams marked by the red star in Figure 10.…”
Section: Validation and Analysis Of Icesat-2 Measured Datasupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It should be noted that main systematic biases in the ICESat-2 data products were calibrated [16,47,48]. However, ATL03 data products may still have small residual systematic biases [22,41].…”
Section: Crossovers Accuracy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Xie and team improved the efficiency of this method by implementing a pyramid optimization strategy [19]. Zhao et al designed a novel terrain-matching technique specifically for estimating systematic biases in pointing and ranging for spaceborne photon-counting laser altimeters [20]. This method, tailored to the attributes of the Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) satellite, calibrates the laser altimeter by matching its ranging profiles with anticipated profiles derived from a robust model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%