2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new test procedure for the dynamic laboratory characterization of thermal systems and their components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Adsorption chiller: the type 290 has been developed directly by the manufacturer (SorTech AG, 2009); the model is based on a performance map rated by the manufacturer. Since the DLL cannot be modified, a post-correction has been applied to validate the model according to the dynamic performance of the chiller rated in the laboratory (Menegon et al, 2014);  Dry cooler: type 880 (Besana, 2009). The model is based on the ε/NTU method and capacitance effects are considered.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Adsorption chiller: the type 290 has been developed directly by the manufacturer (SorTech AG, 2009); the model is based on a performance map rated by the manufacturer. Since the DLL cannot be modified, a post-correction has been applied to validate the model according to the dynamic performance of the chiller rated in the laboratory (Menegon et al, 2014);  Dry cooler: type 880 (Besana, 2009). The model is based on the ε/NTU method and capacitance effects are considered.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The on-off controlled single-stage WSHP operates in monovalent mode and has been oversized to fully cover both SH and SC demand. Its capacity results in about 25 kWth and its performance has been evaluated using a performance map derived from laboratory tests (Menegon and Fedrizzi, 2016). The buffer TES has been sized considering the reference value of 15 litres/kW th with respect to the WSHP thermal power capacity.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing methods for SCS performance evaluation and testing can be classified into two categories, depending on their approach to evaluating primary energy savings: the component approach and the global approach. Methods that are based on the component approach, such as the Component Testing System Simulation (CTSS) [14][15][16][17], the BIN [18,19] methods, consist in separately testing the main Solar Combisystem components (heat store, controllers, thermal collector, heat pump, etc.) according to existing standard tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%