“…While gravitational and topographic datasets can each be used independently to make inferences about the interior structure of a planet, such results are often based upon hypotheses that are not easily testable or models that are highly underconstrained. Thus, although regional topographic models have been constructed for some moons and asteroids (such as Phobos (Wählisch et al, 2010), 433 Eros (Gaskell et al, 2008;Zuber et al, 2000a), Itokawa (Abe et al, 2006;Gaskell et al, 2008), Vesta ( Jaumann et al, 2012), Ganymede (Giese et al, 1998), Europa (Nimmo et al, 2003a,b;Nimmo et al, 2007), Iapetus (Giese et al, 2008), Mimas (Dermott and Thomas, 1988), Enceladus , Tethys , Dione , Rhea , and many of the irregularly shaped satellites of Saturn (Thomas, 2010)) and the longest wavelength gravitational fields and topography have been constrained for others (such as Io (Anderson et al, 2001a;Thomas et al, 1998), Europa (Anderson et al, 1998), Ganymede (Anderson et al, 1996b;Palguta et al, 2006), Callisto (Anderson et al, 2001b), Rhea (Anderson and Schubert, 2010), Titan (Iess et al, 2010;Lorenz et al, 2013), and Vesta (Konopliv et al, 2013a)), this chapter will focus on those planetary bodies for which the gravity and topography are both characterized to high resolution, namely, Earth, Venus, Mars, Mercury, and the Moon.…”