2013
DOI: 10.1016/s1004-9541(13)60564-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Tuning Method for Two-Degree-of-Freedom Internal Model Control under Parametric Uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the actual servo system, there are no ideal parameters such as parameter perturbation, load disturbance, friction and so on [9]. Therefore, the frequency domain method of the PI controller parameters cannot make the servo system to achieve the best state, and it needs further optimization [10].…”
Section: Select Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the actual servo system, there are no ideal parameters such as parameter perturbation, load disturbance, friction and so on [9]. Therefore, the frequency domain method of the PI controller parameters cannot make the servo system to achieve the best state, and it needs further optimization [10].…”
Section: Select Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that it is very difficult to achieve stable and robust control simultaneously between set-point tracking and load-disturbance rejection. Sutikno et al (2013) developed a 2DoF IMC with the Mp-GM (Maximum peak -Gain Margin) tuning method to obtain IMC control parameters. 2DoF IMC can overcome set-point tracking and load-disturbance rejection separately, without affecting each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the design of the control system can be seen as a multi-objective optimization [4], and because there is a trade-off between the setpoint response and the load disturbance attenuation in the 1-DOF PID structure [5,6], the 2-DOF PID structure was proposed [7]. Due to its superiority, the 2-DOF PID has drawn great attention from many researchers, and a great number of tuning methods have been proposed, such as the dominant poles method [8,9], the internal model control (IMC) [10][11][12], the gain-phase margin method (GPM) [13], the maximum sensitivity method [14,15], the desired dynamic equation method (DDE) [16][17][18], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%