2014
DOI: 10.1167/14.3.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new two-alternative forced choice method for the unbiased characterization of perceptual bias and discriminability

Abstract: Perception is often biased by secondary stimulus attributes (e.g., stimulus noise, attention, or spatial context). A correct quantitative characterization of perceptual bias is essential for testing hypotheses about the underlying perceptual mechanisms and computations. We demonstrate that the standard two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) method can lead to incorrect estimates of perceptual bias. We present a new 2AFC method that solves this problem by asking subjects to judge the relative perceptual distances… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specific experiments to study the timing and nature of this adaptation and the just noticeable differences of stimuli will need to be considered. Due to our time limitations we chose to have subjects self-report discriminability, but future experiments could use established psychometric tests [25], [26], [27], [28] to quantitatively measure discriminability and assess changes over time and how the degree of discriminability affects task performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific experiments to study the timing and nature of this adaptation and the just noticeable differences of stimuli will need to be considered. Due to our time limitations we chose to have subjects self-report discriminability, but future experiments could use established psychometric tests [25], [26], [27], [28] to quantitatively measure discriminability and assess changes over time and how the degree of discriminability affects task performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is applicable to the present study, as, although subjects were tasked with identifying localization shifts, there would be some timbral changes due to the use of ICTD. Such conditions would make, for example, a two alternative forced choice method [17] inadequate, with Bech [18] reporting subject's difficulty in distinguishing between test and reference stimuli that differed in loudness, timbre, and spaciousness when utilizing an adaptive form of this method.…”
Section: Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, we designed our experiment so that the general structure of the tasks (i.e., comparison of two elements) and the adjustment procedure was similar and equivalent for all five illusions (both geometrical and non-geometrical illusions). Therefore a dissociation between geometrical illusions and the non-geometrical illusion was very unlikely to stem from unrelated cognitive factors3940. Interestingly, an approach of comparing and correlating the strength of the illusions across participants was pioneered very long ago8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%