2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new unsteady-state method of determining two-phase relative permeability illustrated by CO2-brine primary drainage in berea sandstone

Abstract: This study presents a new unsteady-state method for measuring two-phase relative permeability by obtaining local values of the three key parameters (saturation, pressure drop, and phase flux) versus time during a displacement. These three parameters can be substituted to two-phase Darcy Buckingham Equation to directly determine relative permeability. To obtain the first two, we use a medical X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) scanner to monitor saturation in time and space, and six differential pressure transducer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the capillary and viscous limits converge to the same curve. This behavior is confirmed by the data of Chen and DiCarlo () reported in Figure : although the relative permeabilities were measured at three different capillary numbers (spanning three orders of magnitude), the data are not “stratified” with respect to the capillary number and instead lay on the same universal curve, well described by the scaling relationship , i.e., the normalized relative permeability scales with the square of the mobile saturation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, the capillary and viscous limits converge to the same curve. This behavior is confirmed by the data of Chen and DiCarlo () reported in Figure : although the relative permeabilities were measured at three different capillary numbers (spanning three orders of magnitude), the data are not “stratified” with respect to the capillary number and instead lay on the same universal curve, well described by the scaling relationship , i.e., the normalized relative permeability scales with the square of the mobile saturation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Comparison between the predicted and experimentally measured (Chen & DiCarlo, ) rescaled relative permeability as a function of the mobilized saturation. The viscosity ratio of the system (brine‐CO 2 ) is M = 0.08, while the capillary number is defined by equation , where the velocity scale is defined by the ratio of the volumetric flow rate to the cross‐section area of the core sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the non‐uniform saturation in the entrance, ΔPw is not equal to ΔPnw in the entrance section. Previous studies [ Chen and DiCarlo , ; Chen et al ., , ] have shown that the exit section is dominated by the capillary end effect and we do not calculate relative permeability from the exit section. In summary, CO 2 and brine relative permeabilities are calculated in each of the center three sections and only CO 2 relative permeability is calculated in the entrance section.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study used a similar experimental method to the previous measurements of CO 2 -brine relative permeability at 208C and 10.34 MPa [Chen et al, 2014[Chen et al, , 2016a[Chen et al, , 2016bChen and DiCarlo, 2016]. The difference is that this study used heaters and thermocouples to maintain the floods at elevated temperatures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concurrent improvements of X‐ray microtomography combined with its nondestructive features have allowed direct visualization of pore‐scale structures and distribution of phases as inputs to computational models. A number of authors have investigated pore‐scale phases distribution using X‐ray microtomography and demonstrated the complexity of the nonwetting and wetting phase interface geometry (e.g., Armstrong et al, ; Blunt et al, ; X. Chen & DiCarlo, ; X. Chen et al, ; Gao et al, ; Garing et al, ; Moghadasi et al, ; Prodanovic et al, , ; Reynolds et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%