2021
DOI: 10.19139/soic-2310-5070-1093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Version of the Exponentiated Exponential Distribution: Copula, Properties and Application to Relief and Survival Times

Abstract: In this paper, we introduce a new generalization of the Exponentiated Exponential distribution. Various structural mathematical properties are derived. Numerical analysis for mean, variance, skewness and kurtosis and the dispersion index is performed. The new density can be right skewed and symmetric with "unimodal" and "bimodal" shapes. The new hazard function can be "constant", "decreasing", "increasing", "increasing-constant", "upside down-constant", "decreasing nstant". Many bivariate and multivariate type… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to compare the fits of the distributions, we consider Cramèr-Von-Mises (CVM) and Anderson-Darling (AD) goodness of fit statistics. These two statistics are essentially modifications of the K-S test statistic and are usually thought to be more powerful than the original K-S test, which are also favoured by many researchers (for example Yousof et al [32], Ibrahim et al [30], Khalil et al [26], Lak et al [27], Elgohari [29], Mohamed et al [28]). Moreover for more accuracy, we consider another five goodness of fit measures based on the log-likelihood functions namely, -2 × log-likelihood (-2logL), Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Consistent Akaike Information Criterion (CAIC), Hannan-Quinn Information Criterion (HQIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC).…”
Section: Real Data Demonstrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare the fits of the distributions, we consider Cramèr-Von-Mises (CVM) and Anderson-Darling (AD) goodness of fit statistics. These two statistics are essentially modifications of the K-S test statistic and are usually thought to be more powerful than the original K-S test, which are also favoured by many researchers (for example Yousof et al [32], Ibrahim et al [30], Khalil et al [26], Lak et al [27], Elgohari [29], Mohamed et al [28]). Moreover for more accuracy, we consider another five goodness of fit measures based on the log-likelihood functions namely, -2 × log-likelihood (-2logL), Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Consistent Akaike Information Criterion (CAIC), Hannan-Quinn Information Criterion (HQIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC).…”
Section: Real Data Demonstrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%