1983
DOI: 10.1086/353302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New View of Early Greek Astronomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even Plato stated that very few understood how the planets moved. 43 However, the three elements, because of their brief mentions in the Phaenomena, are interesting because Gee takes them and demonstrates how the later Roman tradition lays hold of them. The real importance of the planets lies in the meaning of the word, rather than in their actual movements.…”
Section: Critiquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even Plato stated that very few understood how the planets moved. 43 However, the three elements, because of their brief mentions in the Phaenomena, are interesting because Gee takes them and demonstrates how the later Roman tradition lays hold of them. The real importance of the planets lies in the meaning of the word, rather than in their actual movements.…”
Section: Critiquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…52 Duhem (1969); Lloyd (1991). Alan Bowen and Bernard Goldstein challenge Simplicius' account of early astronomy: Goldstein and Bowen (1983); Bowen (2002). 53 As Malcolm Wilson noted in private correspondence, this cannot be Philoponus' entire answer, since he stresses the problems with the opsis account.…”
Section: 'It Makes No Difference': Finding Room For the Intermediate mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On some claims that I accepted in 1980 because they were part of standard story, I am now much more sceptical, notably those concerning the roles of Eudoxus and Hipparchus for, in both cases, their contributions are only known from later sources that are susceptible to various interpretations and whose reliability is often dubious (Bowen and Goldstein, 1991; Goldstein and Bowen, 1983; 1991). A detailed discussion of these matters would now require a monograph.…”
Section: Commentaries On ‘The Status Of Models In Ancient and Medievamentioning
confidence: 99%