2003
DOI: 10.1002/fld.553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new VOF‐based numerical scheme for the simulation of fluid flow with free surface. Part I: New free surface‐tracking algorithm and its verification

Abstract: SUMMARYNumerical simulation of uid ow with moving free surface has been performed. For the free surface ow, a volume of uid (VOF)-based algorithm utilizing a ÿxed grid system has been investigated. In order to reduce numerical smearing at the free surface represented on a ÿxed grid system, a new free surface-tracking algorithm based on the donor-acceptor scheme has been proposed. Novel features of the proposed algorithm are characterized by two numerical tools; the orientation vector to represent the free surf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
52
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, the performance of new interface tracking techniques is frequently benchmarked using free surface flow systems, such as the collapse of a liquid column under gravity (Koshizuka and Oka, 1996;Kim and Lee, 2003;Sochnikov and Efrima, 2003;Yue et al, 2003;Bonet et al, 2004;Cruchaga et al, 2007). Using the experimental data of Cruchaga et al (2007), Koshizuka and Oka (1996) and Martin and Moyce (1952), the interface tracking capabilities of the VOF model built into OpenFOAM Ò and the TVSED function at T R = 0 and T R =1 were compared for the case of a collapsing column of water with initial width, L = 0.114 m, and aspect ratio, A R = H/L =2.…”
Section: Free Surface Flow: Collapse Of a Liquid Columnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the performance of new interface tracking techniques is frequently benchmarked using free surface flow systems, such as the collapse of a liquid column under gravity (Koshizuka and Oka, 1996;Kim and Lee, 2003;Sochnikov and Efrima, 2003;Yue et al, 2003;Bonet et al, 2004;Cruchaga et al, 2007). Using the experimental data of Cruchaga et al (2007), Koshizuka and Oka (1996) and Martin and Moyce (1952), the interface tracking capabilities of the VOF model built into OpenFOAM Ò and the TVSED function at T R = 0 and T R =1 were compared for the case of a collapsing column of water with initial width, L = 0.114 m, and aspect ratio, A R = H/L =2.…”
Section: Free Surface Flow: Collapse Of a Liquid Columnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the variable grid methods, known as well as Lagrangian methods, the interface coincides with the front of the moving grid, which has to be redefined after each time step [3,10]. For the fixed grid or Eulerian methods [11,21], the grid is unique and remains constant during the whole calculation process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim and Lee [10] implemented an explicit formulation of the VOF equation on terms of the actual fractional volume of fluid which is a measure of the wetted area of the boundary of a control volume. In this method, the effective volume of a cell is calculated as a function of the orientation vector of the free surface and the value of the volume fraction in such a cell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the great majority of the reported works, the referred Laplace equation is solved using a finite element method, which is the obvious choice for complex geometry discretized domains. The difficulty associated with the use of the Finite Element method regards the evaluation of the mass flow-rate along the grid, which is commonly carried out by creating control volumes around the grid nodes and using the element local system of coordinates to calculate the resin fluxes along the In VOF method the volume fraction f of each fluid volume is determined by solving a transport equation for f, but this solution tends to smear in the volumes close to the moving surface 22 . The gradient of f should be singular at the interface of two inviscid fluids, however it becomes finite in the numerical solution, causing this abnormality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%