2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3246518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Water Law Vista: Rooting the Public Trust Doctrine in the Courts

Abstract: Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are problems with the trust doctrine which stem from the fact that it has the potential to defeat the will of elected representatives [125], results in inappropriate discounting of environmental values [126] and raises questions on whether it could supply a comprehensive approach to natural resource management and whether it has further use in an era of environmental protection laws [124]. However, it has been used to take steps to protect water resources, even if doing so would conflict with some other interests (like private water rights) as seen in McBryde Sugar Co. v. Robinson, 504 P.2d 1330, 1344 [127]. In addition, states can sue to protect trust resources under their parens patriate powers [128] and members of the public (who otherwise have standing) may sue the state for failing to comply with its trust obligations over a particular body of water as seen in Nat'l Audubon Soc'y v. Super.…”
Section: The Public Trust Doctrinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are problems with the trust doctrine which stem from the fact that it has the potential to defeat the will of elected representatives [125], results in inappropriate discounting of environmental values [126] and raises questions on whether it could supply a comprehensive approach to natural resource management and whether it has further use in an era of environmental protection laws [124]. However, it has been used to take steps to protect water resources, even if doing so would conflict with some other interests (like private water rights) as seen in McBryde Sugar Co. v. Robinson, 504 P.2d 1330, 1344 [127]. In addition, states can sue to protect trust resources under their parens patriate powers [128] and members of the public (who otherwise have standing) may sue the state for failing to comply with its trust obligations over a particular body of water as seen in Nat'l Audubon Soc'y v. Super.…”
Section: The Public Trust Doctrinementioning
confidence: 99%