A new wave of context: Introduction to the special issue on socioecological approaches to psychology.

Brutzman, Brian; Bustos, Tatiana E.; Hart, Mackenzie J.; Neal, Jennifer Watling

doi:10.1037/tps0000337

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… Adler et al, 2021 , Braun and Clarke, 2006 , Brutzman et al, 2022 , Dunlop and Tracy, 2013 , McLeroy et al, 1988 , Meloni et al, 2012 , Nario-Redmond et al, in press , Pettinicchio et al, 2021 , Rogers et al, in press , Syed, xxxx , Tennent, 2018 , Umucu and Lee, 2020 , Vélez-Agosto et al, 2017 .…”

Section: Uncited Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Narrative identity among people with disabilities in the United States during the Covid-19 pandemic: The interdependent self

Adler

Manning

Hennein

et al. 2022

Journal of Research in Personality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Uncited Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Narrative identity among people with disabilities in the United States during the Covid-19 pandemic: The interdependent self

Adler

Manning

Hennein

et al. 2022

Journal of Research in Personality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rethinking Barriers and Enablers in Qualitative Health Research: Limitations, Alternatives, and Enhancements

Haynes,

Loblay

2024

Qual Health Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Explorations of barriers and enablers (or barriers and facilitators) to a desired health practice, implementation process, or intervention outcome have become so prevalent that they seem to be a default in much health services and public health research. In this article, we argue that decisions to frame research questions or analyses using barriers and enablers (B&Es) should not be default. Contrary to the strengths of qualitative research, the B&Es approach often bypasses critical reflexivity and can lead to shallow research findings with poor understanding of the phenomena of interest. The B&Es approach is untheorised, relying on assumptions of linear, unidirectional processes, universally desirable outcomes, and binary thinking which are at odds with the rich understanding of context and complexity needed to respond to the challenges faced by health services and public health. We encourage researchers to develop research questions using informed deliberation that considers a range of approaches and their implications for producing meaningful knowledge. Alternatives and enhancements to the B&Es approach are explored, including using ‘whole package’ methodologies; theories, conceptual frameworks, and sensitising ideas; and participatory methods. We also consider ways of advancing existing research on B&Es rather than doing ‘more of the same’: researchers can usefully investigate how a barrier or enabler works in depth; develop and test implementation strategies for addressing B&Es; or synthesise the B&Es literature to develop a new model or theory. Illustrative examples from the literature are provided. We invite further discussion on this topic.

show abstract

A new wave of context: Introduction to the special issue on socioecological approaches to psychology.

Cited by 2 publications

References 34 publications

Narrative identity among people with disabilities in the United States during the Covid-19 pandemic: The interdependent self

Narrative identity among people with disabilities in the United States during the Covid-19 pandemic: The interdependent self

Rethinking Barriers and Enablers in Qualitative Health Research: Limitations, Alternatives, and Enhancements

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About