2015
DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2015.1051514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A no-displacement option? Rights, risks and negotiated settlement in development displacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…National legislation and international policy guidance also encourages developers to negotiate directly with landholders and users. This situation interlocks corporate and local actors in a high-stakes engagement, where asymmetries in access to information and resources can exacerbate tensions (Price, 2015b).…”
Section: Resettlement With Development Intended Goal or Guaranteed Omentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…National legislation and international policy guidance also encourages developers to negotiate directly with landholders and users. This situation interlocks corporate and local actors in a high-stakes engagement, where asymmetries in access to information and resources can exacerbate tensions (Price, 2015b).…”
Section: Resettlement With Development Intended Goal or Guaranteed Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As outlined in Chapter Three, the topic is an emerging focus of DCDR literature (see for example Cernea, 2015;Fernandes, 2011;Mathur, 2016a;Price, 2010Price, , 2015bT. Scudder, 2009 Academics examining corporate-led development in mining have already established the limitations of a "business case" argument for social investment (see Gilberthorpe & Banks, 2012;Idemudia, 2011), and for the private sector more broadly (see Blowfield, Jamali, & Karam, 2015;Frynas, 2008).…”
Section: Resettlement With Development Intended Goal or Guaranteed Omentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations