2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience 2009
DOI: 10.1109/qomex.2009.5246976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A no-reference sharpness metric sensitive to blur and noise

Abstract: A no-reference objective sharpness metric detecting both blur and noise is proposed in this paper. This metric is based on the local gradients of the image and does not require any edge detection. Its value drops either when the test image becomes blurred or corrupted by random noise. It can be thought of as an indicator of the signal to noise ratio of the image. Experiments using synthetic, natural, and compressed images are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of this metric. Its statist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) No reference metrics: Recent NR metrics are based on the assumption that the distortion types are known (such as blocking artifacts [28], blur and noise [29], [30], [31], JPEG [32] or JPEG2000 compression [33], [34], and others [35], [36]). There is an important notion proposed by Ferzli and Karam: Just-Noticeable Blur (JNB) [37], [38], which takes into account the response of the HVS to sharpness at different contrast levels.…”
Section: ) Full Reference Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) No reference metrics: Recent NR metrics are based on the assumption that the distortion types are known (such as blocking artifacts [28], blur and noise [29], [30], [31], JPEG [32] or JPEG2000 compression [33], [34], and others [35], [36]). There is an important notion proposed by Ferzli and Karam: Just-Noticeable Blur (JNB) [37], [38], which takes into account the response of the HVS to sharpness at different contrast levels.…”
Section: ) Full Reference Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An image sharpness metric, which can estimate the local image blur even in the presence of noise [20,19], is implemented here. The metric is based on the singular values of local gradient matrix, which have already been calculated in the SK construction stage, so it does not require much extra calculation.…”
Section: The Glas Kernelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metric is based on the singular values of local gradient matrix, which have already been calculated in the SK construction stage, so it does not require much extra calculation. The local metric Q for the pixel located at x l is defined as [20,19]:…”
Section: The Glas Kernelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DS approaches assume that the distortion type is known as a prior knowledge. These methods mainly measure the impact of one distortion type on the image quality such as blur [1][2] or ringing [3]. One important feature of DS approaches, which limits their application domain, is that they are distortion-specific.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%