A Node Identity Internetworking Architecture

Ahlgren, Bengt; Arkko, Jari; Eggert, Lars; Rajahalme, Jarno

doi:10.1109/infocom.2006.51

Cited by 68 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…An approach aims at improving the current Internet [25]- [30]. The other approach aims at NwGN [31]- [35]. None of the proposals described above satisfy the four requirements.…”

Section: Requirements To Id/locator Split Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

ZNA: A Six-Layer Network Architecture for New Generation Networks —— Focusing on the Session Layer, the Network Layer, and Cross-Layer Cooperation ——

Teraoka

Kanemaru

Yonemura

et al. 2014

IEICE Trans. Commun.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYUsing "clean-slate approach" to redesign the Internet has attracted considerable attention. ZNA (Z Network Architecture) is one of clean-slate network architectures based on the layered model. The major features of ZNA are as follows: (1) introducing the session layer to provide the applications with sophisticated communication services, (2) employing inter-node cross-layer cooperation to adapt to the dynamically changing network conditions, (3) splitting the node identifier and the node locator for mobility, multi-homing, and heterogeneity of network layer protocols, (4) splitting the data plane and the control plane for high manageability, and (5) introducing a recursive layered model to support network virtualization. This paper focuses on the first three topics as well as the basic design of ZNA.

show abstract

“…An approach aims at improving the current Internet [25]- [30]. The other approach aims at NwGN [31]- [35]. None of the proposals described above satisfy the four requirements.…”

Section: Requirements To Id/locator Split Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

ZNA: A Six-Layer Network Architecture for New Generation Networks —— Focusing on the Session Layer, the Network Layer, and Cross-Layer Cooperation ——

Teraoka

Kanemaru

Yonemura

et al. 2014

IEICE Trans. Commun.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[5], [6]), indicating the current point of attachment in the network topology, is replaced by a clear separation of information self-certifying object identifiers and locators. 4WARD designs a networking architecture where mobility, multi-homing and security are an intrinsic part of the network architecture rather than addon solutions.…”

Section: Towards Networking Of Informationmentioning

confidence: 99%

4WARD: A European Perspective towards the Future Internet

Brunner

Abramowicz

Niebert

et al. 2010

IEICE Trans. Commun.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYIn this paper, we describe several approaches to address the challenges of the network of the future. Our main hypothesis is that the Future Internet must be designed for the environment of applications and transport media of the 21st century, vastly different from the initial Internet's life space. One major requirement is the inherent support for mobile and wireless usage. A Future Internet should allow for the fast creation of diverse network designs and paradigms and must also support their coexistence at run-time. We detail the technical and business scenarios that lead the development in the EU FP7 4WARD project towards a framework for the Future Internet.

show abstract

“…Ambient Networks have developed a framework of naming, addressing and identity mechanisms that enable dynamic bindings for supporting connectivity across heterogeneous network domains [10]. Furthermore, node-identity-based internetworking architecture is proposed in paper [11]. The Mobility Management framework [12] describes an IP-based Mobility Management framework.…”

Section: Design Motivationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Proxy Mobile IPv6 Based Global Mobility Management Architecture and Protocol

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper specifies a global mobility management architecture and protocol procedure called GPMIP, which is based on Proxy Mobile IPv6. In GPMIP, mobility management is performed by the network entity rather than individual mobile nodes. The benefit is the elimination of the wireless link data delivery tunnel overhead between a mobile node and the access router. To compare with the well known Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 mobility management protocol, the location update, packet delivery, and total cost functions generated by a mobile node during its average domain residence time are formulated for each protocol based on fluid flow mobility model. Then, the impacts of various system parameters on the cost functions are analyzed. The analytical results indicate that the proposed global mobility management protocol can guarantee lower total costs. Furthermore, a qualitative comparison between GPMIP and some other global management protocols is also investigated.

show abstract

A Node Identity Internetworking Architecture

Cited by 68 publications

References 19 publications

ZNA: A Six-Layer Network Architecture for New Generation Networks —— Focusing on the Session Layer, the Network Layer, and Cross-Layer Cooperation ——

ZNA: A Six-Layer Network Architecture for New Generation Networks —— Focusing on the Session Layer, the Network Layer, and Cross-Layer Cooperation ——

4WARD: A European Perspective towards the Future Internet

A Proxy Mobile IPv6 Based Global Mobility Management Architecture and Protocol

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About