A nomenclatural analysis of the generic names of phanerogams proposed byF. M. Opiz in his Seznam rostlin květeny české

Holub, Josef; Pouzar, Zdeněk

doi:10.1007/bf02854724

Cited by 16 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The ancestor is unknown. The classification within this group by Elenevsky (1977,1978) seems to be more accurate than the one by Yamazaki (1957), whereas Holub (in Holub & Pouzar, 1967) The genera Synthyris Benth. and Besseya Rydberg considered together differ from Veronica only in their rosette habit (Pennell, 1933).…”

Section: Veronicastrummentioning

confidence: 75%

“…9 ICBN; Greuter & al., 2000). More than a century later this name was restored by Hartl (1966), Holub & Pouzar (1967), and Yamazaki (1968), mainly because of the deviating chromosome base number (x = 17) and the longer corolla tube and densely packed inflorescence, which seemed to differ from those of Veronica as much as did those of Hebe. The shrubby genus Hebe from New Zealand and South America with dorsiventrally flattened fruit (rather than a laterally flattened fruit as in Veronica) had been established by Jussieu in 1789 but had not come into common use until 1921 for the South American plants (Pennell, 1921), and 1926 for the New Zealand species (Cockayne & Allan, 1926).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A new classification of the tribe Veroniceae—problems and a possible solution

Albach

Martínez‐Ortega

Fischer

et al. 2004

TAXON

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on the most recent evidence from phylogenetic analyses of Veronica and its related genera, we propose a new infratribal and infrageneric rearrangement for Veroniceae and Veronica. These recent analyses have settled the long dispute about the relationship of the Northern Hemisphere Veronica and the Southern Hemisphere Hebe complex and have shown the derivation of the latter from within the former. Other currently recognized genera such as Synthyris and Pseudolysimachion are also derived from within Veronica. A classification based on monophyletic genera therefore needs to either lump some well recognized genera into a large genus Veronica or split Veronica into several genera that seem impossible to separate using morphological or structural characters. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages and conclude that it is best to recognize a large genus Veronica (including Hebe, Parahebe, Chionohebe, Heliohebe, Detzneria, Derwentia, Pseudolysimachion, Synthyris and Besseya) with 13 subgenera, along with 8 other genera, Scrofella, Veronicastrum (inclusive of Calorhabdos and Botryopleuron), Lagotis, Wulfenia, Kashmiria, Picrorhiza, Wulfeniopsis and Paederota, in Veroniceae.

show abstract

Section: Veronicastrummentioning

confidence: 75%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A new classification of the tribe Veroniceae—problems and a possible solution

Albach

Martínez‐Ortega

Fischer

et al. 2004

TAXON

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Veronica (Kampny and Dengler, 1997;Raman, 1989), endosperm development (Yamazaki, 1957;Afanasiyeva, 1971), and a particular type of pollen (Martinez-Ortega et al, 2000) and seed characters (Martinez-Ortega and Rico, 2001). Pseudolysimachion Koch was accepted at the generic rank by Yamazaki (1957), Holub and Pauzar (1967), Hartl (1968), Hong (1984), Kampny andDengler (1997), andRico (2001). DNA sequence studies support its distinctiveness but also show that it is derived from within Veronica (e.g., Fig.…”

Section: Veronica VIImentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Jelenevskij (1978) divided section Alsinebe into three and adopted an additional section, Stenocarpon Boriss. The generic rank of Pseudolysimachion Opiz was accepted by Yamazaki (1957), Holub and Pauzar (1967), Hartl (1968), Fischer (1974), and Hong (1984). Finally, Hong and Nilsson (1983) and Hong (1984) separated Cochlidiosperma Rchb.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Phylogeny of Veronica ‐ a Combination of Molecular and Chemical Evidence

2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A molecular phylogenetic tree of the genus Veronica, based on sequences of the ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA, provided a framework to test the use of iridoid chemical data in the classification of the genus. The distribution of ten iridoid glucosides, determined in 27 species of Veronica, supported the molecular results. The nine clades of the molecular tree appeared to correlate with a specific pattern of catalpol esters and chromosome base numbers. Some relationships within Veronica, previously suggested on the basis of morphological and karyological characters, were supported by our data. Neither the molecular, nor the chemical features were in favour of the classical circumscription and classification of the genus.

show abstract

“…In C Europe, reintegration of Australasian Hebe and relatives and North American Synthyris Benth. will be of interest mainly to horticulturists, but reintegration of Pseudolysimachion, the species of Veronica with dense, spicate inlorescences, reverses a split adopted by many European Floras since the 1960s (Holub & Pouzar 1967). All European species of Pseudolysimachion were originally described as species of Veronica.…”

Section: Plantaginaceae (D C Albach)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Which changes are needed to render all genera of the German flora monophyletic?

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The use of DNA sequence data in plant systematics has brought us closer than ever to formulating wellfounded hypotheses about phylogenetic relationships, and phylogenetic research keeps on revealing that plant genera as traditionally circumscribed often are not monophyletic. Here, we assess the monophyly of all genera of vascular plants found in Germany. Using a survey of the phylogenetic literature, we discuss which classiications would be consistent with the phylogenetic relationships found and could be followed, provided monophyly is accepted as the primary criterion for circumscribing taxa. We indicate whether and which names are available when changes in generic assignment are made (but do not present a comprehensive review of the nomenclatural aspects of such names). Among the 840 genera examined, we identiied c. 140 where data quality is suiciently high to conclude that they are not monophyletic, and an additional c. 20 where monophyly is questionable but where data quality is not yet suicient to reach convincing conclusions. While it is still iercely debated how a phylogenetic tree should be translated into a classiication, our results could serve as a guide to the likely consequences of systematic research for the taxonomy of the German lora and the loras of neighbouring countries.

show abstract

A nomenclatural analysis of the generic names of phanerogams proposed byF. M. Opiz in his Seznam rostlin květeny české

Cited by 16 publications

References 1 publication

A new classification of the tribe Veroniceae—problems and a possible solution

A new classification of the tribe Veroniceae—problems and a possible solution

Phylogeny of Veronica ‐ a Combination of Molecular and Chemical Evidence

Which changes are needed to render all genera of the German flora monophyletic?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About