2012
DOI: 10.1080/14682745.2012.671297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A nominal defence? NATO threat perception and responses in the Balkan area, 1951–1967

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, national threat perceptions are salient in threat perceptions literature (see Blank, 2008;Chourchoulis, 2012;Darwich, 2016;Farnham, 2003;Fordham, 1998;Gries et al, 2009;Jung, 2010;Kemmelmeier, & Winter, 2000;Minkina, 2011;Ridout, Grosse, & Appleton, 2008;Sinkkonen, & Elovainio, 2020;Tamaki, 2012;Vinayaraj, 2009;Zhu, 2002). Threat of nuclear war had been added to this during the Cold War (see Lebovic, 2009;Mayton II, 1986;Schatz, & Fiske, 1992).…”
Section: The Political Psychology Of Threat Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, national threat perceptions are salient in threat perceptions literature (see Blank, 2008;Chourchoulis, 2012;Darwich, 2016;Farnham, 2003;Fordham, 1998;Gries et al, 2009;Jung, 2010;Kemmelmeier, & Winter, 2000;Minkina, 2011;Ridout, Grosse, & Appleton, 2008;Sinkkonen, & Elovainio, 2020;Tamaki, 2012;Vinayaraj, 2009;Zhu, 2002). Threat of nuclear war had been added to this during the Cold War (see Lebovic, 2009;Mayton II, 1986;Schatz, & Fiske, 1992).…”
Section: The Political Psychology Of Threat Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In effect the doctrine meant that any attack on Greek borders by a country of the Eastern Bloc would be considered a casus belli for the NATO alliance (Wells Jr., 1981). Until 1955 when the Greek-Turkish rivalry reached its first peak, Bulgaria was considered the main external threat for Greek interests (Chourchoulis 2012). The geographical formation of the borders with Bulgaria and Yugoslavia offered no advantage to Greece as the latter lacked strategic depth to develop its defending forces or even plan a counterattack.…”
Section: An Overview Of Greece's Nato Membershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make matters worse, by the mid-1960s Greece and Turkey lacked the economic base to move on to the elaborate, technology-oriented military organization which NATO demanded. For all practical purposes, NATO military doctrine was only partially applicable in their case because of their economic weakness and strategic vulnerability (Iatrides 1968;Hatzivassiliou 2006;Chourchoulis 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%