2021
DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A nomogram-based immune-serum scoring system predicts overall survival in patients with lung adenocarcinoma

Abstract: Objective: The immunoscore, which is used to quantify immune infiltrates, has greater relative prognostic value than tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) stage and might serve as a new system for classification of colorectal cancer. However, a comparable immunoscore for predicting lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) prognosis is currently lacking. Methods: We analyzed the expression of 18 immune features by immunohistochemistry in 171 specimens. The relationship of immune marker expression and clinicopathologic factors to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6 P–R). Interestingly, in contrast to our findings, these three scoring modalities have been shown to be predictive of prognosis in lung cancer patients [ 22 24 ]. These differences could be potentially caused by a low number of cases in each subgroup in our current study as well as our more specific classification of the different pathological types, which may reflect the state of the different tumor microenvironments.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…6 P–R). Interestingly, in contrast to our findings, these three scoring modalities have been shown to be predictive of prognosis in lung cancer patients [ 22 24 ]. These differences could be potentially caused by a low number of cases in each subgroup in our current study as well as our more specific classification of the different pathological types, which may reflect the state of the different tumor microenvironments.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…High-throughput genomic studies provided cutting-edge sights into the molecular mechanisms and identi ed new potential targets of breast cancer [33][34][35][36]. Nevertheless, using a single biomarker for predicting often relatively lower predictive effects, and a risk model for predicting the OS and DRFS of patients [37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and a nomogram were popular which showed superior predictive effects as a better alternative [18, [44][45][46]. Meanwhile E2F related genes had been selected to build a model for predict the DRFS of breast cancer patients [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Number at risk: n (%) Grade 9837 (79) 12427 ( 100) 5195 ( 42) 7296 (59) 2517 ( 20) 3679 (30) 805 ( 6) 1566 (13) 203 (2) GradeII 7375 ( 58) 12681 ( 100) 3163 ( 25) 4760 (38) 1419 ( 11) 2125 (17) 441 ( 3) 870 (7) 109 (1) GradeIII 177 ( 61) 288 ( 100) 77 ( 27) 114 (40) 34 ( 12) 52 (18) 13 ( 5) 23 ( 8 38) 9586 (53) 3345 ( 19) 4838 (27) 1090 ( 6) 2086 (12) 272 (2) Upper lobe 1194 (75) 1589 ( 100) 623 ( 39) 874 (55) 295 ( 19) 427 (27) 76 ( 5) 172 (11) 27 (2) Middle lobe 6915 (74) 9336 ( 100) 3552 ( 38) 4982 (53) 1699 ( 18) 2502 ( 27) 560 ( 6) 1070 (11) 137 (1) Lower lobe 184 ( 60) 309 ( 100) 94 ( 30) 133 (43) 46 (15) 69 …”
Section: Gradeiunclassified
“…Te majority of previous nomograms in LUAD have focused on factors such as lesion size, lymph node metastasis, histological types, treatment factors, pathological stage, lymph node invasion, and age [17][18][19]. Nonetheless, there is a lack of comprehensive and accurate nomograms for predicting the survival of LUAD patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%