2006
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non‐diffusive, divergence‐free, finite volume‐based double projection method on non‐staggered grids

Abstract: SUMMARYSecond-order accurate projection methods for simulating time-dependent incompressible flows on cellcentred grids substantially belong to the class either of exact or approximate projections. In the exact method, the continuity constraint can be satisfied to machine-accuracy but the divergence and Laplacian operators show a four-dimension nullspace therefore spurious oscillating solutions can be introduced. In the approximate method, the continuity constraint is relaxed, the continuity equation being sat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, the approximate projection operator does not depress high-frequency modes standing for a local decoupling of the magnetic field as occurred for the decoupling of the velocity field in numerical solutions of incompressible flows (Aprovitola & Denaro 2007;Rider 1998). For robust consideration, filtering is necessary, especially for long-term integrations.…”
Section: Multigrid Methods For Cleaning Magnetic Field Divergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the approximate projection operator does not depress high-frequency modes standing for a local decoupling of the magnetic field as occurred for the decoupling of the velocity field in numerical solutions of incompressible flows (Aprovitola & Denaro 2007;Rider 1998). For robust consideration, filtering is necessary, especially for long-term integrations.…”
Section: Multigrid Methods For Cleaning Magnetic Field Divergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This removes the spurious oscillations due to odd-even decoupling and produces results very similar to those obtained when using a staggered grid (Ferziger and Peric, 2002;Peric et al, 1988). Many authors point out that the Rhie and Chow interpolation method results in a scheme that does not conserve kinetic energy (Aprovitola and Denaro, 2007;Shashank et al, 2010;Felten and Lund, 2006) although the ramification of this shortcoming seem to be a major problem only in LES turbulence simulations of high accuracy. In commercial software, it seems to be the dominant type of interpolation method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Projection methods are a popular choice for solving the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations (Chorin, 1968). For projection methods on colocated grids, there are both exact projection methods (EPM) and approximate projection methods (APM), both with advantages and drawbacks (Aprovitola and Denaro, 2007). The main difference between the two methods is that the discrete divergence criteria can be satisfied to machine precision for the EPM, whereas the APM takes on a more relaxed divergence criteria constraint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this methodology, the cell-centered option was adopted from the pioneering works of Chorin [3], Peric et al [4], and Majumdar [5], to the recent contributions [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], while finite-volume applications of vertexcentered meshes are reported by [19][20][21][22]. Collocated meshes are known to generate spatially oscillating, checkerboard-like pressure fields, which can be eliminated through the so-called momentum interpolation, due to Rhie and Chow [23], by which continuity is no longer satisfied in its discretized form, but only in the limit of refinement, according to the order of the scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%