2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11134-007-9029-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-increasing Lindley-type equation

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we study the Lindley-type equation W = max{0, B − A − W }. Its main characteristic is that it is a non-increasing monotone function in its main argument W . Our main goal is to derive a closed-form expression of the steady-state distribution of W . In general this is not possible, so we shall state a sufficient condition that allows us to do so. We also examine stability issues, derive the tail behaviour of W , and briefly discuss how one can iteratively solve this equation by using a c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, we have w(x) = (1 + sin x) e −sx and w(x + y) = e −sx e −sy + e −sx sin x e −sy cos y + e −sx cos x e −sy sin y , see also some details in Asmussen (2003, p. 89) and Vlasiou (2007).…”
Section: Preliminaries and Examplesmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then, we have w(x) = (1 + sin x) e −sx and w(x + y) = e −sx e −sy + e −sx sin x e −sy cos y + e −sx cos x e −sy sin y , see also some details in Asmussen (2003, p. 89) and Vlasiou (2007).…”
Section: Preliminaries and Examplesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In the case where the function w(x) is a tail distribution, the decomposition given in Eq. 3 have been used independently by Willmot (2007), Vlasiou (2007) and Lefévre (2007). In fact, in the renewal model of risk theory, Willmot (2007), see also Landriault and Willmot (2008), used a similar factorization as Eq.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar result under more general assumptions on the distribution of A and B seems hard to obtain, unless N = 2 (cf. [23]). …”
Section: Tail Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is not smaller than each of the arguments in the outer maximum operator in the right-hand side of (23). For the first argument, we have by using (22) and (21), respectively, that…”
Section: Mean Waiting Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%