A non-invasive geometric morphometrics method for exploring variation in dorsal head shape in urodeles: sexual dimorphism and geographic variation inSalamandra salamandra

Abstract

The study of morphological variation among and within taxa can shed light on the evolution of phenotypic diversification. In the case of urodeles, the dorso-ventral view of the head captures most of the ontogenetic and evolutionary variation of the entire head, which is a structure with a high potential for being a target of selection due to its relevance in ecological and social functions. Here, we describe a non-invasive procedure of geometric morphometrics for exploring morphological variation in the external dorso-ventral view of urodeles' head. To explore the accuracy of the method and its potential for describing morphological patterns we applied it to two populations of Salamandra salamandra gallaica from NW Iberia. Using landmark-based geometric morphometrics, we detected differences in head shape between populations and sexes, and an allometric relationship between shape and size. We also determined that not all differences in head shape are due to size variation, suggesting intrinsic shape differences across sexes and populations. These morphological patterns had not been previously explored in S. salamandra, despite the high levels of intraspecific diversity within this species. The methodological procedure presented here allows to detect shape variation at a very fine scale, and solves the drawbacks of using cranial samples, thus increasing the possibilities of using collection specimens and alive animals for exploring dorsal head shape variation and its evolutionary and ecological implications in urodeles. J. Morphol. 278:475-485, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Flesh and bone: An integrative approach towards sexual size dimorphism of a terrestrial salamander (genus Salamandrina)

“…The sexes can also be dissimilar in ways other than overall body size: divergence in body shape is also possible, and quite common. However, research on sexual shape dimorphism (SShD) is much scarcer than on SSD (e.g., Alarcón‐Ríos, Velo‐Antón, & Kaliontzopoulou, ; Gidaszewski, Baylac, & Klingenberg, ; Ivanović, Sotiropoulos, Furtula, Džukić, & Kalezić, ; Schwarzkopf, ). As cryptic intersexual differences in shape or body proportions are not captured if only body length is analyzed (Reinhard, Renner, & Kupfer, ; Schwarzkopf, ) SShD is only detectable by multivariate morphometrics (e.g., Malmgren & Thollesson, ; Reinhard & Kupfer, ).…”

Clasp and dance: Mating mode promotes variable sexual size and shape dimorphism trajectories in crocodile newts (Caudata: Salamandridae)

“…Sexual shape dimorphisms in the cranium of other newts and salamanders comprise differences in vomer length, quadrate position, occipital region size, skull width and snout shape (Ivanović et al, 2008, Alarcón-Rios et al, 2017. These shape changes were also present in crocodile newts, but they additionally differ in the extent of the squamosal bone.…”

“Nose-metrics” of wild southern elephant seal (Mirounga leonina) males using image analysis and geometric morphometrics

“…These difficulties are clearly amplified in studies of wild subjects displaying their normal behavior in natural conditions (Sonnweber et al., ). Indeed, previous applications to soft tissues of live non‐human animals, such as the one by Alarcón‐Ríos, Velo‐Antón, and Kaliontzopoulou (), were typically using captured and/or sedated individuals.…”