2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-linear case-based reasoning approach for retrieval of similar cases and selection of target credits in LEED projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Turkey, Spain, and Italy, 108 LEED-CIv3 and LEED-C and S Gold projects [12] and in Finland, Sweden, Turkey, and Spain, 133 LEED-NCv3 projects [13] were evaluated. Thus, LEED-NC is the most popular system and often issued by design teams [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Turkey, Spain, and Italy, 108 LEED-CIv3 and LEED-C and S Gold projects [12] and in Finland, Sweden, Turkey, and Spain, 133 LEED-NCv3 projects [13] were evaluated. Thus, LEED-NC is the most popular system and often issued by design teams [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, a significant number of them were conducted to support the design process and identify appropriate LEED credits for the project during the early phase, when the design changes are much higher in efficiency and less costly [3,4]. Cheng and Ma (2015) studied the relationship between LEED credits and green building technologies/sustainability design strategies to improve the effectiveness of LEED credits selection [11]. M.A.…”
Section: Background Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jack C.P. Cheng's paper (2015) proposed a case-based reasoning (CBR) approach to find out the suitable case study base on the similar previously certificated green building projects and suggestions on target LEED credits [11]. F. Jalaei and A. Jrade's study (2015) (BIM) explains how this integration would assist project teams in making sustainability-related decisions [15].…”
Section: Background Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To prove the effectiveness of the CFST-LSTM model, its prediction performance is compared with other traditional machine learning models and commonly seen neural networks. These contain three traditional machine learning models, including LASSO regression, Ridge regression, and support vector regression (SVR), and two commonly seen neural networks, including artificial neural network (ANN) and recurrent neural network (RNN) [43][44][45][46][47]. The parameters of these algorithms were all tuned using the same grid search process.…”
Section: Model Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%