2021
DOI: 10.3934/cpaa.2021059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non local approximation of the Gaussian perimeter: Gamma convergence and Isoperimetric properties

Abstract: We study a non local approximation of the Gaussian perimeter, proving the Gamma convergence to the local one. Surprisingly, in contrast with the local setting, the halfspace turns out to be a volume constrained stationary point if and only if the boundary hyperplane passes through the origin. In particular, this implies that Ehrhard symmetrization can in general increase the non local Gaussian perimeter taken into consideration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To conclude, we notice that in the recent [14], the authors give a different notion of Gaussian fractional perimeter of a measurable set E in a bounded domain Ω ⊂ R N using a singular integral representation of the form and they prove the Gamma convergence of (1 − s)P γ s (E; Ω) to the Gaussian perimeter as s → 1 − exploiting techniques similar to the ones used in [1]. See also [4], where kernels with faster than L 1 decay at infinity are taken into account.…”
Section: Further Remarks and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…To conclude, we notice that in the recent [14], the authors give a different notion of Gaussian fractional perimeter of a measurable set E in a bounded domain Ω ⊂ R N using a singular integral representation of the form and they prove the Gamma convergence of (1 − s)P γ s (E; Ω) to the Gaussian perimeter as s → 1 − exploiting techniques similar to the ones used in [1]. See also [4], where kernels with faster than L 1 decay at infinity are taken into account.…”
Section: Further Remarks and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In the last Sect. 4 we prove that for the Gaussian fractional perimeter defined and used in [8] the asymptotics for s → 0 + is trivial.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Letmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In Section 3 we firstly prove our Main Theorem by stating and proving the ancillary Propositions 3.3 and 3.4 and we show some properties of the limit set function µ. In the last Section 4 we prove that for the Gaussian fractional perimeter defined and used in [7] the asymptotics for s → 0 + is trivial.…”
Section: Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 96%