2010
DOI: 10.5269/bspm.v28i2.11338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non resonance under and between the two first eigenvalues in a nonlinear boundary problem

Abstract: In this paper we study the non resonance of solutions under and between the two first eigenvalues for the problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Throughout this subsection, we work on gathering needed properties to apply a version of the classical "Mountain Pass Theorem" for a C 1 functional restricted to a C 1 manifold (see [1,8]). Our purpose is of course to obtain existence results for (P f ) and by doing so, extend some of the known results in [4,5,7]. In order to have things well defined in the context of variational approach, we consider for u ∈ W 1,p (Ω),…”
Section: Nonresonance Between the First Two Eigenvaluesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Throughout this subsection, we work on gathering needed properties to apply a version of the classical "Mountain Pass Theorem" for a C 1 functional restricted to a C 1 manifold (see [1,8]). Our purpose is of course to obtain existence results for (P f ) and by doing so, extend some of the known results in [4,5,7]. In order to have things well defined in the context of variational approach, we consider for u ∈ W 1,p (Ω),…”
Section: Nonresonance Between the First Two Eigenvaluesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem was actually considered recently in [7] for the p-Laplacian operator (in the case V ≡ 0), where the existence of the p-harmonic solutions was proved. Also in [5], the case V ≡ 1 was treated under and between the first two eigenvalues. In the present paper, we shall adapt and extend the approach in [7] in order to We simply write ∆ instead of ∆ 2 and call the 2-Laplace operator simply Laplace operator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%