2015
DOI: 10.1111/fct.12206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non‐rigorous investigation of aroma–acupressure and aromatherapy treatment of dementia‐associated agitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, randomisation was done at the institution level, but individuals were the unit of analysis. These limitations cast doubt on the cause and effect relationship between the study's positive findings and the interventions [36].…”
Section: Effects By Outcome Measures 341 Agitationmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, randomisation was done at the institution level, but individuals were the unit of analysis. These limitations cast doubt on the cause and effect relationship between the study's positive findings and the interventions [36].…”
Section: Effects By Outcome Measures 341 Agitationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…No significant change in agitation was detected in the control group throughout the study. This study was criticised for having nonequivalent groups at baseline whereby the groups' sizes vary and differed in mean age and dementia diagnostic categories significantly (p<.01) [36]. The mean pre-test CMAI score of the aroma-acupressure group also had a difference more than a standard deviation compared to the mean of the control groups.…”
Section: Effects By Outcome Measures 341 Agitationmentioning
confidence: 96%