2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gmod.2019.101046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-stationary Catmull–Clark subdivision scheme with shape control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both schemes generate conics but the cubic exponential B-spline scheme is C 2 convergent while the non-stationary 4-pt interpolatory scheme is C 1 convergent. In addition, as seen in [9], for h 0 (x) and h 1 (x), combining with the iteration in (3), we have lim…”
Section: The Variant Cubic Exponential B-spline Schemementioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Both schemes generate conics but the cubic exponential B-spline scheme is C 2 convergent while the non-stationary 4-pt interpolatory scheme is C 1 convergent. In addition, as seen in [9], for h 0 (x) and h 1 (x), combining with the iteration in (3), we have lim…”
Section: The Variant Cubic Exponential B-spline Schemementioning
confidence: 95%
“…It follows that, with the functions h 0 (x) and h 1 (x) behaving differently as shown in ( 4) and ( 5), the non-stationary 4-pt interpolatory scheme can generate curves with more kinds of shapes than the exponential cubic B-spline scheme [9]. In this way, similar to [9], based on the iteration in (3), we choose a function such that it satisfies (4) and ( 5) with i = 1. Here, we can choose h(x) as the following one…”
Section: The Variant Cubic Exponential B-spline Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations