42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475)
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2003.1271674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A nonlinear dynamic filter to improve disturbance rejection in optical storage drives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, boosting the low-frequency gain of the controller may weaken the phase-lead property around the cutoff frequency, and thus degrade the dampening property. To avoid this difficulty in designing a nominal track servo, several approaches have been proposed based on the disturbance observers (Kim [2002(Kim [ , 2003, Kim and Hong [2002], Shim et al [2003Shim et al [ , 2004), the repetitive control (Doh et al [2006], Steinbuch et al [2007], Doh et al [2002], Dong et al [2003]) or a nonlinear control (Heertjes and Sperling [2003]).…”
Section: Track Servomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, boosting the low-frequency gain of the controller may weaken the phase-lead property around the cutoff frequency, and thus degrade the dampening property. To avoid this difficulty in designing a nominal track servo, several approaches have been proposed based on the disturbance observers (Kim [2002(Kim [ , 2003, Kim and Hong [2002], Shim et al [2003Shim et al [ , 2004), the repetitive control (Doh et al [2006], Steinbuch et al [2007], Doh et al [2002], Dong et al [2003]) or a nonlinear control (Heertjes and Sperling [2003]).…”
Section: Track Servomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the conventional trade-off between disturbance rejection and measurement noise sensitivity is needed. In Heertjes and Sperling [2003], disturbance rejection is improved by using a nonlinear dynamic filter, which is an additional gain to the feedback controller, and the small gain theorem is used to guarantee absolute stability. Performance is also quantified using a measure derived from the linear sensitivity functions (Heertjes and Steinbuch [2004]).…”
Section: Fault Detection and Shock Disturbancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface faults impose an upper limit on the controller bandwidth, which is in conflict with the minimization of the disturbances channels, since those controllers have a high bandwidth. (Heertjes and Sperling, 2003) and (Heertjes and Steinbuch, 2004) indirectly handle the surface faults by the use of non-linear filters to improve controller sensibility without making the controllers more sensitive towards the surface faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of estimators to obtain accurate TE information when the optical pickup passes surface defects has been considered in [135], [169], and [170]. A nonlinear dynamic filter providing an additional gain to the feedback controller can be used to improve disturbance rejection [145], [171]. An experimental performance analysis based on frequency-domain measurements has also been made [172].…”
Section: ) Focus Servomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boosting the low-frequency gain of the controller may weaken the phase-lead property around the cutoff frequency and thus degrade the dampening property. To avoid this difficulty in designing a nominal track servo, various approaches have been proposed based on disturbance observers [136], [138]- [141], repetitive control [121], [142]- [144], or nonlinear control [145].…”
Section: ) Focus Servomentioning
confidence: 99%