2021
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A nonlinear solar magnetic field calibration method for the filter-based magnetograph by the residual network

Abstract: The method of solar magnetic field calibration for the filter-based magnetograph is normally the linear calibration method under weak-field approximation that cannot generate the strong magnetic field region well due to the magnetic saturation effect. We try to provide a new method to carry out the nonlinear magnetic calibration with the help of neural networks to obtain more accurate magnetic fields. We employed the data from Hinode/SP to construct a training, validation and test dataset. The narrow-band Stok… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have used this type of method in tackling astronomical problems. Guo et al (2021) used this method to the inversion of magnetic field. The design of the residual block in ResNet makes training deep networks possible.…”
Section: Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many studies have used this type of method in tackling astronomical problems. Guo et al (2021) used this method to the inversion of magnetic field. The design of the residual block in ResNet makes training deep networks possible.…”
Section: Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We anticipate what the output azimuth angle is before correcting the 180 degree ambiguity, that is, the predicted transverse field direction can be the reverse of the actual direction. So, we then use the residual between prediction and target, which was used by Guo et al (2021) when training the network of azimuth angle:…”
Section: Loss Function and Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the wealth of archival data, differences in resolution, spectral inversion techniques, instrument noise levels, or other instrument properties prevent us from easily combining data across instruments to study magnetic field structures over multiple solar cycles (Figure 1) (e.g., Díaz Baso & Asensio Ramos 2018). Compared to traditional cross-calibration techniques such as pixel-to-pixel comparison (Liu et al 2012), histogram equalization (Riley et al 2014), or harmonic scaling (Virtanen & Mursula 2019), machine learning (ML) has previously been shown to successfully calibrate magnetograms (Guo et al 2021;Higgins et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach, based on real data, was described in (Guo et al, 2021) or (Liu et al, 2020). The authors of the latter used real data taken from the Near InfraRed Imaging Spectropolarimeter at the Big Bear Solar Observatory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%