2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4954304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A nonlinear structural subgrid-scale closure for compressible MHD. II. A priori comparison on turbulence simulation data

Abstract: Even though compressible plasma turbulence is encountered in many astrophysical phenomena, its effect is often not well understood. Furthermore, direct numerical simulations are typically not able to reach the extreme parameters of these processes. For this reason, large-eddy simulations (LES), which only simulate large and intermediate scales directly, are employed. The smallest, unresolved scales and the interactions between small and large scales are introduced by means of a subgrid-scale (SGS) model. We pr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice however that this is only a part of the non-linear dynamics involved in MHD turbulence. The overall great performance of the gradient model are well known [28,32,33,[49][50][51][52], due to the strong mathematical basis on which it relies. Let us stress that we have explored different initial conditions, finding mainly the same results.…”
Section: B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice however that this is only a part of the non-linear dynamics involved in MHD turbulence. The overall great performance of the gradient model are well known [28,32,33,[49][50][51][52], due to the strong mathematical basis on which it relies. Let us stress that we have explored different initial conditions, finding mainly the same results.…”
Section: B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of detailed 3D spatio-temporal observations and/or experimental data, numerical simulations are often used to support the interpretation of observations or, in the case of turbulence research, have become one of the major drivers of scientific advances. This pertains, for example, to studying energy dissipation and turbulent energy cascades, (e.g., Yang et al 2016;Grete et al 2017;Andrs et al 2018) or to turbulence modeling (Clark et al 1979;Germano et al 1991;Chernyshov et al 2012;Grete et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our a priori analysis [24] we tested three different model families, eddy-dissipation, scale-similarity, and nonlinear models, with different normalizations. All models were tested against the expressions (5) and (6) where the filtered nonlinear term is not split into additional components.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model allows for energy transfer down-and up-scale and, as a structural closure, aims at reproducing closely the properties of the SGS terms and not just their effects on the large scales. c. The nonlinear (NL) model is another structural model and exhibited the highest correlations with reference data in a priori tests [23,24]. It can be derived from Taylor expansion of the inverse filter kernel [13,28] and requires no further assumptions about the underlying flow features.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation