The present study investigates the impact of corrosion anomaly classes on the prediction accuracy of seven existing burst capacity models for corroded pipelines, namely B31G, B31G-M, Shell92, PCORRC, PCORRC-M, CSA and RSTRENG, based on 897 corrosion anomalies on 16 naturally corroded pipe specimens removed from in-service pipelines. The 897 corrosion anomalies are classified into seven classes, namely pin hole, axial slotting, axial grooving, circumferential slotting, circumferential grooving, pitting and general corrosion, based on the pipeline operators forum (POF) anomaly classification system. The seven burst capacity models and finite element analyses (FEA) are employed to evaluate the burst capacities of the corrosion anomalies. The accuracies of the burst capacity models are assessed and compared based on the FEA-to-model predicted burst capacity ratios for different classes of anomalies. The results suggest that the PCORRC model is suitable for the non-general classes of corrosion anomalies, whereas the CSA model is recommended for the general corrosion class of anomalies.