2006
DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2006.876323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Nonparametric VSS NLMS Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
174
0
12

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 336 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
174
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…In all simulations, we show the normalized MSD, E w o − w(k) 2 / w o 2 which is evaluated by ensemble averaging over 20 independent trials. Also, we assume that the noise variance, σ 2 v , is known a priori [13]. For all simulations we consider α = 0.99, and C = 10 −5 .…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all simulations, we show the normalized MSD, E w o − w(k) 2 / w o 2 which is evaluated by ensemble averaging over 20 independent trials. Also, we assume that the noise variance, σ 2 v , is known a priori [13]. For all simulations we consider α = 0.99, and C = 10 −5 .…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a technique used by majority of the algorithms presented in this paper, namely by Harris, 7 Shan, 15 Karni, 16 Benveniste, 17 Evans, 18 Mathews, 19 Ang, 20 Benesty, 21 Wahab, 22 Hwang 23 and Wang. 24 In many solutions this technique is based on the orthogonality principle, which states that (under some assumptions) the necessary and sufficient condition for the mean-square error to attain its minimum value is that the error signal e(n) and the input signal u(n) are orthogonal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Three parameters, but without an upper bound for the step size, are also required by Benesty's algorithm. 21 The remaining algorithms are parametrized by more than three values, with the maximum of eight in case of Zou's algorithm. 14 The goal of this paper is to review the VS-LMS techniques developed by different authors for different uses and to compare them in three typical applications: identification, line enhancement, and adaptive noise cancellation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not desirable to rely only on DTD because the NEC has tight requirements for detecting double-talk. Thus, several adaptive filtering algorithms are developed focusing on the robustness to double-talk [10]- [14]. One of the method is using L 1 -norm minimization of error because L 1 -norm algorithms are especially robust against impulsive noise such as speech.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%